https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #8 from Scott Boyce ---
Sorry for sending a second message, my test cases have a workaround already
added to the code for the Finalization, but the code posted has issues with
ALLOCATION of derived types.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #7 from Scott Boyce ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
Thanks that is excellent news about the finalization.
There also is the issue with the ALLOCATION as well.
Another set of test cases are my Batteries Included Fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108651
--- Comment #3 from Scott Boyce ---
No its not correct because the
[integer(int64)::
in
INTEGER(INT64), dimension(2), parameter:: arr1 = [integer(int64)::
-3300711175878204139, 8258803693257250632]
is the initialization is indicating that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #5 from Scott Boyce ---
Comment on attachment 54395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54395
Source Part 1
This is a part 1 of a 3 part zip file created with 7zip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108652
Bug ID: 108652
Summary: type-bound procedure that returns integer used to
allocate character on stack
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108651
Bug ID: 108651
Summary: Array Constructor with [type-spec:: fails to apply to
all values, eg x = [integer(int64):: 1,2,3,4]
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108650
Bug ID: 108650
Summary: Error: IMPORT statement only permitted in an INTERFACE
body | but it should be allowed in any contained
routine to control scope
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #4 from Scott Boyce ---
Created attachment 54397
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54397&action=edit
Source Part 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #3 from Scott Boyce ---
Created attachment 54396
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54396&action=edit
Source Part 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #2 from Scott Boyce ---
Created attachment 54395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54395&action=edit
Source Part 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
--- Comment #1 from Scott Boyce ---
Missing attachment in first post
I was unable to compress the source code to 1MB.
So I will make it into a mutlipart zip over the next three posts.
If you want to download a single zip file, it is located at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108649
Bug ID: 108649
Summary: allocation segmentation fault for pointer derive type
and ICE for final-binding
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
Scott Boyce changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Boyce at engineer dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99609
--- Comment #3 from Scott Boyce ---
Yeah that is the same bug request. Though it is for version 11, any chance of
back-porting to version 9 and 10?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99609
Bug ID: 99609
Summary: Pure Function that has a Variable with Value Attribute
that is modified
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
15 matches
Mail list logo