[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 14:41 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > in online docs i see that "q" means "byte addressable register (a,b,c,d)". > > in i386.h i see something differ

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 14:22 --- in online docs i see that "q" means "byte addressable register (a,b,c,d)". in i386.h i see something differ for x86_64. did i miss something in docs? #define REG_CLASS_FROM_LETTER(C)

[Bug other/21398] gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21398

[Bug other/21398] New: gcc emits invalid operands for xchgb %b0, %h0

2005-05-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
r AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: amd64-pld-linux GCC host triplet: amd64-pld-linux GCC target triplet: amd64-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21398

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) to hide a symbol

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 00:37 --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > The first attempt is at > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01835.html > > > > p

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) to hide a symbol

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) to hide a symbol

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-05 00:31 --- (In reply to comment #12) > The first attempt is at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01835.html > patches for pr19664 and 20218 kill gcc bootstrap. gcj fails:

[Bug other/21382] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden breaks OpenEXR-1.2.2 build.

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382

[Bug other/21382] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden breaks OpenEXR-1.2.2 build.

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-04 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8819) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8819&action=view) build log. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382

[Bug other/21382] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden breaks OpenEXR-1.2.2 build.

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-05-04 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8818) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8818&action=view) build log. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382

[Bug other/21382] New: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden breaks OpenEXR-1.2.2 build.

2005-05-04 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC

[Bug middle-end/21291] [4.0/4.1 Regression] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2005-04-30 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-30 09:35 --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I can't build the Objective Caml compiler with this gcc error :/ > > (...) > Also using -fomit-frame-pointer works aroun

[Bug rtl-optimization/21291] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2005-04-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-29 21:43 --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is most likely not really a bug. I can't build the Objective Caml compiler with this gcc error :/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21291

[Bug rtl-optimization/21291] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2005-04-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21291

[Bug other/21291] can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2005-04-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-29 21:22 --- Created an attachment (id=8768) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8768&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21291

[Bug other/21291] New: can't find a register in class 'GENERAL_REGS' while reloading 'asm'

2005-04-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
FIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux

[Bug middle-end/21237] [4.0/4.1 Regression] unnecessary __cmpdi2 usage?

2005-04-28 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-28 18:04 --- __cmdi2 isn't used with -O0 but it is with -O1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237

[Bug other/21237] unnecessary __cmpdi2 usage?

2005-04-26 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-26 16:48 --- Created an attachment (id=8746) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8746&action=view) asm dump -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237

[Bug other/21237] unnecessary __cmpdi2 usage?

2005-04-26 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-26 16:46 --- Created an attachment (id=8745) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8745&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237

[Bug other/21237] New: unnecessary __cmpdi2 usage?

2005-04-26 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: ppc-pld

[Bug c++/20949] [4.0/4.1 Regression] misscompilation of konqueror, artsd, STLport, libstdc++, ...

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-11 22:38 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well without a test, there is still nothing we can do anyways because they could be invoking undefined > behavior :). > Also do they fail when compiled with -O0? Konque

[Bug c++/20949] [4.0 Regression] misscompilation of konqueror, artsd, STLport, libstdc++, ...

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mmazur at kernel dot pl http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20949

[Bug c++/20949] [4.0 Regression] misscompilation of konqueror, artsd, STLport, libstdc++, ...

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-11 15:58 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well without a test, there is still nothing we can do anyways because they could be invoking undefined > behavior :). > Also do they fail when compiled with -O0? art

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-11 14:43 --- (In reply to comment #28) > Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return > value when we cannot > > On 11 Apr 2005 08:59:58 -0000, "pluto at pld-linux dot org" <

[Bug c++/20949] New: misscompilation of konqueror, artsd, STLport, libstdc++, ...

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
TLport, libstdc++, ... Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at

[Bug rtl-optimization/20586] bootstrap comparision fails with -funroll-loops.

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-11 13:08 --- Problem still exists in 4.0.0-20050409 snap. I've checked the i386.o and caller-save.o from stage2/3. They have the same size but diff. instructions in several places. --- stage2-i386.o.txt 2005-04-

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-04-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-11 08:59 --- (In reply to comment #26) > Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return > value when we cannot > > Have you tested the 4.0 branch with the temporary fix I applied? > > Jas

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-04-08 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-09 02:29 --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #15) please ignore previous post. gcc passes params in the right way but something is wrong. with the original sourcecode gdb shows stack frame with inva

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-04-08 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-08 13:33 --- (In reply to comment #15) > thats the same issue like the konqueror crash which I couldn't > find a workaround for in gcc either. (gdb) bt #0 ~QIconSet (this=0x8209614) at qshared.h:50 ~QIc

[Bug other/20741] reject valid code (?)

2005-04-03 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-03 18:55 --- Created an attachment (id=8522) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8522&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20741

[Bug other/20741] New: reject valid code (?)

2005-04-03 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
nent: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20741

[Bug other/20349] [multilib] libjava(32) doesn't build.

2005-03-25 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-25 14:05 --- (In reply to comment #5) > This is defined on my x86-64 system: > grep sigaction /usr/include/bits/syscall.h > #define SYS_rt_sigaction __NR_rt_sigaction > #define SYS_sigaction __NR_sigaction

[Bug other/20349] [multilib] libjava(32) doesn't build.

2005-03-25 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-25 12:37 --- (In reply to comment #3) > This looks like a bug in your installation of glibc. > #define INIT_SEGV \

[Bug middle-end/20635] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in cgraph_mark_reachable_node

2005-03-25 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at pld-linux dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20635

[Bug libstdc++/19265] problem with _S_destroy_thread_key when using dynamic libraries

2005-03-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at pld-linux dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19265

[Bug middle-end/20218] Can't use __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) to hide a symbol

2005-03-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at pld-linux dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218

[Bug libstdc++/19265] problem with _S_destroy_thread_key when using dynamic libraries

2005-03-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-24 13:16 --- (In reply to comment #9) > I can confirm this (unfortunately, haha). hmm, --save-temps option produces totally diff. plugin and behaviuor :O this is really amazing. # make clean all OPT="-O" rm

[Bug c++/19317] [4.0/4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-03-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-24 11:07 --- (In reply to comment #15) > thats the same issue like the konqueror crash which I couldn't > find a workaround for in gcc either. > > Please looka at the PR19265 testcase (htt

[Bug other/20586] New: bootstrap comparision fails with -funroll-loops.

2005-03-21 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20586

[Bug other/20531] New: gcc should warn about undefined behaviour

2005-03-18 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
our Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu

[Bug c++/19317] [4.0/4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-03-17 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-17 18:22 --- so, we have an unaccaptable g++ at this moment :/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19317

[Bug other/20449] [c++] internal compiler error

2005-03-12 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-12 23:54 --- Created an attachment (id=8379) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8379&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20449

[Bug other/20449] New: [c++] internal compiler error

2005-03-12 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
ponent: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-12 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-12 17:55 --- finally I've fixed this problem with this patch. gcc was bootstraped and tested successfuly on ix86 and amd64. --- gcc-4.0-20050305/libjava/Makefile.am.orig +++ gcc-4.0-20050305/libjava/Makefi

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-12 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-12 10:02 --- I've noticed that below change fixes relinking. Could anonyone merge this fix to Makefile{.am,.in} ? --- libgcj0_convenience.la.orig 2005-03-12 06:07:36.0 +0100 +++ libgcj0_convenience.la

[Bug other/20426] error: initializer element is not constant

2005-03-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-11 14:19 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Note in C++ they will be constants though but not in C. C has different rules for constant expressions > than C++. Thanks for explain. I have one more basic question. Why t

[Bug other/20426] New: error: initializer element is not constant

2005-03-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
c dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-linux GCC host triplet: i686-linux GCC target triplet: i686-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20426

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-11 01:29 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=8374) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8374&action=view) > test patch. > Attached patch was wrong. Now I have lib

[Bug c++/19317] [4.0/4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 23:49 --- CC'ed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto a

[Bug rtl-optimization/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 23:00 --- I've just built qt334/kde340(core) with -march=i686 -O/-O2. They are totally broken (damaged grahpics/widgets) :/ I don't have a testcase at this moment but gcc4 has a serious bug.

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 19:53 --- Created an attachment (id=8374) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8374&action=view) test patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20392

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 19:11 --- I've recheckd the install log and found the reason of relinking error. /home/users/pluto/multimedia/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-i686-pld-linux/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/users/pluto/multi

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-10 19:01 --- [~/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-i686-pld-linux/i686-pld-linux/libjava/.libs] drwxr-xr-x 2 pluto users 4096 2005-03-10 19:51 . drwxr-xr-x 15 pluto users 4096 2005-03-10 19:51 .. -rw--- 1

[Bug libgcj/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 13:49 --- (In reply to comment #2) > This does not make sense: > (cd /home/users/pluto/multimedia/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-i686-pld-linux/i686-pld- > linux/libjava; /bin/sh ./libtool --tag CXX --mo

[Bug regression/20392] invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 08:18 --- Created an attachment (id=8368) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8368&action=view) install log. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20392

[Bug regression/20392] New: invalid install/relink of llibgcj{,0_convenience} during `make install`

2005-03-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
enience} during `make install` Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pl

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2005-03-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-09 08:07 --- works with recent snapshots. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug other/20349] [multilib] libjava(32) doesn't build.

2005-03-06 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-03-07 07:21 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you try again? I think this was caused by the patch for PR 20155 which had to be reverted. it didn't helped. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20349

[Bug other/20349] New: [multilib] libjava(32) doesn't build.

2005-03-06 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
j-amd64-pld-linux/amd64-pld-linux/32/libjava' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/users/pluto/rpm/BUILD/gcc-4.0-20050305/obj-amd64-pld-linux/amd64-pld-linux/32/libjava' make[3]: *** [multi-do] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/users/pluto/r

[Bug middle-end/18628] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompilation of switch statement in loop

2005-02-28 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-28 20:09 --- CC'ed. ps). qt-3.3.4 built by gcc4-20050226 is also broken. my testcase (jabber client - psi) is unusable. -- What|Removed |

[Bug tree-optimization/20188] [4.0 Regression] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

2005-02-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 23:44 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have no idea what is going on here but I will note that "-O3 -fno-tree-dominator-opts" works. > "-O3 -fno-ivopts" does not work > "-O3 -

[Bug other/20188] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

2005-02-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 19:40 --- -O3 break zic. # log: bash -v build.sh #!/bin/sh rm -rf Asia Mideast zic *.o gcc -o zic zic.i ialloc.c scheck.c -DNOID -Wall -O2 ./zic -d ./ -L /dev/null -y ./yearistype solar87 && echo "

[Bug other/20188] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

2005-02-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 19:38 --- Created an attachment (id=8272) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8272&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20188

[Bug other/20188] glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

2005-02-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-24 13:30 --- (In reply to comment #0) > gcc-4.0.0-20050220+pr13397 - fails. s/13397/19937/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20188

[Bug other/20188] New: glibc-2.3.4 misscompilation.

2005-02-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
us: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet:

[Bug other/20128] New: ice on valid code / mudflap + profile generate

2005-02-21 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
e generate Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot g

[Bug ada/20089] [4.0 Regression] gnatmake broken when building ada tools

2005-02-21 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-21 17:53 --- CC'ed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto a

[Bug other/20106] New: binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2 misscompilation.

2005-02-20 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
t gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20106

[Bug ada/19961] New: ice / gnat bug detected.

2005-02-14 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: amd64-pld-linux GCC host triplet: amd64-pld-linux GCC target triplet: amd64-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19961

[Bug regression/19935] New: unexpected "bx lr" in arm mode.

2005-02-13 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: regression AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build

[Bug rtl-optimization/18427] [meta-bug] We need a better register allocator

2005-02-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-11 11:27 --- CC /me -- What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at pld

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-11 10:47 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The new register allocator (new-ra) has been removed because it was buggy and > there were no plans to fix it. > I was using it to show that the initial MOV was an unrela

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2005-02-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-02-10 20:17 --- (In reply to comment #2) > As Andrew pointed out, the merge of the eor and the rotate is now done on > mainline in 4.0. Hmm, it doesn't work on my gcc. # arm-pld-linux-gcc reversing_the_byte

[Bug ada/19865] New: ice / gnat bug detected.

2005-02-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
nu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: ppc-pld-linux GCC host triplet: ppc-pld-linux GCC target triplet: ppc-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19865

[Bug ada/19369] fatal error: file gnatbind.ali is incorrectly formatted

2005-01-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-01-11 18:50 --- (In reply to comment #0) > the final stage of profiledboostrap fails. > # fragment of gcc4-20050109 buildlog: > > (...) > gcc -c -O2 -march=i686 -mtune=pentium4 -ggdb -fomit-fram

[Bug ada/19369] New: fatal error: file gnatbind.ali is incorrectly formatted

2005-01-11 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19369

[Bug other/19316] New: kernel built with gcc-3.4.3 works / with gcc-4.0.0 doesn't work.

2005-01-07 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
4.0.0 doesn't work. Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: g

[Bug other/19289] ice during gcc4-20050102 profiledboostrap.

2005-01-06 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-01-06 14:23 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Did you build in a clean directory? Here's my build script: # rm -rf builddir && mkdir builddir && cd builddir # ../configure \ #{options} #

[Bug other/19289] New: ice during gcc4-20050102 profiledboostrap.

2005-01-06 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC host triplet: i686-pld-linux GCC target triplet: i686-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19289

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2005-01-05 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-01-05 22:49 --- # buildlog: http://149.156.124.14/~pluto/tmp/gcc.log.bz2 (...) /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c  'libgij.la' '/tmp/gcc-4.0.0-root-pluto/usr/lib/libgij.la' libto

[Bug bootstrap/19186] internal compiler error: virtual array prologue[3]: element 1 out of bounds in contains, at function.c:4660

2004-12-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-29 08:45 --- Created an attachment (id=7841) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7841&action=view) buildlog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19186

[Bug bootstrap/19186] New: internal compiler error: virtual array prologue[3]: element 1 out of bounds in contains, at function.c:4660

2004-12-29 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
bounds in contains, at function.c:4660 Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-lin

[Bug other/19088] volatile attr. doesn't work with pointers / wrong code

2004-12-20 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-20 12:11 --- oops, unlockMutex contains an error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19088

[Bug other/19088] New: volatile attr. doesn't work with pointers / wrong code

2004-12-20 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
ity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: mingw GCC target triplet: arm-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19088

[Bug c++/19030] ice on tree check

2004-12-16 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-16 09:09 --- Created an attachment (id=7753) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7753&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030

[Bug c++/19030] New: ice on tree check

2004-12-16 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC host triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC target triplet: pentium3-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19030

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2004-12-13 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-14 13:28 --- gcc-4.0-20041205 built by gcc-3.4-20041203 => libgij.so doesn't exist. gcc-4.0-20041212 built by gcc-4.0-20041205 => libgij.so exists. Is this a bootstrap problem? -- http://gcc.gnu.o

[Bug other/18928] ice on valid code.

2004-12-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-10 16:48 --- Created an attachment (id=7719) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7719&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18928

[Bug other/18928] New: ice on valid code.

2004-12-10 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC host triplet: pentium3-pld

[Bug ada/17312] internal gnat bug. compilation abandoned.

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-10 07:46 --- gcc(ada)-3.4.3/4.0.0snap now builds/works fine with -march=pentium3. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/18910] ice with -O2 / works fine with -O0.

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-09 20:08 --- Created an attachment (id=7716) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7716&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18910

[Bug other/18910] New: ice with -O2 / works fine with -O0.

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
h -O0. Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-09 19:40 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Again try to compile without using the rpm. manual `make all` doesn't build libgij.so :/ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18909

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-09 18:44 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > How did you configure gcc? > > > This works for me and many other people. > >

[Bug libgcj/18909] gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-12-09 18:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) > How did you configure gcc? > This works for me and many other people. # gcj -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/pentium3-pld-linux/4.0.0/specs Reading specs from /usr/l

[Bug libgcj/18909] New: gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?)

2004-12-09 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
bjava/libgij.la -- Summary: gij needs libgij.so (wrong linking/build?) Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug c++/18676] ice

2004-11-25 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2004-11-25 21:01 --- Created an attachment (id=7610) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7610&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18676

[Bug c++/18676] New: ice

2004-11-25 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC host triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC target triplet: pentium3-pld-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18676

[Bug rtl-optimization/18648] New: empty loop / missed-optimization

2004-11-24 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: pentium3-pld-linux GCC h

[Bug rtl-optimization/18560] New: better optimalization of EOR/MOV block.

2004-11-19 Thread pluto at pld-linux dot org
sion: 3.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at pld-linux dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build tri

  1   2   >