https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #30 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #29)
> > There's no testcase named "pr78746.f90" in the testsuite.
>
> Ideed! My prx.f90 are in the test suite only when they are fixed.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #29 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> There's no testcase named "pr78746.f90" in the testsuite.
Ideed! My prx.f90 are in the test suite only when they are fixed.
Now my "pr78746.f90" is exactly charlen_03.f90.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #28 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef7d053ea33cc9abc7fc413213705a16478fefc4
commit r9-9162-gef7d053ea33cc9abc7fc413213705a16478fefc4
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19eb1973321375190485bc49e68992863b1972bf
commit r10-9234-g19eb1973321375190485bc49e68992863b1972bf
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b6f1e8f97fe0d435d334075821149dbd85c8266
commit r11-6505-g8b6f1e8f97fe0d435d334075821149dbd85c8266
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Still worth fixing, but IMHO a low priority.
Well, there is a latent bug that may show on an other target.
There are seven other PRs containing heap-use-after-free:
48776 ICE(segfault) after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15)
> I still get
>
> % gfcg charlen_10.f90
> charlen_10.f90:5:39:
>
> 5 | character(:), allocatable :: x(y)1 ! { dg-error "must have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I still get
% gfcg charlen_10.f90
charlen_10.f90:5:39:
5 | character(:), allocatable :: x(y)1 ! { dg-error "must have a
deferred shape" }
| 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Dominique: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
The attached tests are still failing on trunk (9.0).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Dominique: Can the bug be marked as resolved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon ---
I confirm that charlen_15 now compiles & executes OK for me.
charlen_03 and charlen_10 have been removed, so they no longer fail :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Both of the remaining testcases now compile for me.
> Probably can close this PR.
With my instrumented gfortran compiler I still see failures similar to the one
reported in comment 2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #8)
> I have removed the two failing testcase and attached them to this PR.
>
> It is likely the dg-error will need to be updated when the bug is
> fixed.
Both of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have removed the two failing testcase and attached them to this PR.
It is likely the dg-error will need to be updated when the bug is
fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40360=edit
charlen_10.f90 source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40359
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40359=edit
charlen_30.f90 testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Dec 17 23:10:01 2016
New Revision: 243778
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243778=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-12-17 Steven G. Kargl
PR
27 matches
Mail list logo