https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
coypu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coypu at sdf dot org
--- Comment #10 from coypu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The documentation on -fomit-frame-pointer says: "Don't keep the frame pointer
in a register for functions that don't need one."
where whether soemthing needs a frame pointer or not is not precisely defined
(e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #8 from Łukasz Kucharski ---
Jakub,
fair enough. However, changing the optimization level should not break the
compilation. The issue is, at least for me, is not that we can't omit the frame
pointer, but that it depends on the optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #6 from Łukasz Kucharski ---
Comment on attachment 33833
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33833
Example program that fails compilation with optimization enabled.
Hello,
I believe we run into the same problem, ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
Łukasz Kucharski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luk32 at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #4 from Brooks Moses ---
Thanks. I have to admit that that does seem more generally useful! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Brooks Moses from comment #2)
> Ping? Any updates on this?
Sorry, I'll look at this in a week or if I am lucky this week. Right now, I am
quite busy with register rematerialization pass in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
--- Comment #2 from Brooks Moses ---
Ping? Any updates on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
10 matches
Mail list logo
