https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #56 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3
commit r11-8784-g383295aaada04b02b733ab6b9e069dfb020d47b3
Author: Iain Sandoe
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #55 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23
commit r12-2226-g41bd1b190358fce213f5add8396faf14a32d5c23
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |10.4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #54 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
After an update to Fink's dejagnu, I got similar results.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #53 from Iain Sandoe ---
on macOS 10.15 (Darwin19) with r12-637-g56103737 comparing unpatched / patched.
-WARNING: 29_atomics/atomic_float/wait_notify.cc execution test program timed
out.
-FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_float/wait_notify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #52 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to lucier from comment #51)
> /Users/lucier/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/
> atomic_integral/wait_notify.cc -std=gnu++2a -pthread
> -fdiagnostics-plain-output ./libtes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #51 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
I'm running fink:
i expect 5.45-206Tool for automatic interactive applications
i dejagnu 1.6.1-1 Framework for testing other programs
i tcltk 1:8.6.10-2 Too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #50 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to lucier from comment #49)
> > > Running
> > > /Users/lucier/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/
> > > conformance.exp ...
> > > WARNING: program timed out.
> >
> > The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #49 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
> > and "make; make -k check".
>
> Which, presumably, succeeded [repeatably?] (also presumably with some
> failing tests, since we don't have a clean testsuite on macOS).
It gave reasonab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #48 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to lucier from comment #47)
> I downloaded
> [Bradleys-Mac-mini:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline] lucier% git log -1 --oneline
> 2254b3233b5 (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #47 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
I downloaded
[Bradleys-Mac-mini:~/programs/gcc/gcc-mainline] lucier% git log -1 --oneline
2254b3233b5 (HEAD -> master, origin/trunk, origin/master, origin/HEAD) PR
middle-end/100325 - missin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #46 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 50737
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50737&action=edit
trial patch for testing
looking at the way other ports handle things like use of registers in veneers
etc. it s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe ---
the i386 backend code already sets :
TARGET_CALL_FUSAGE_CONTAINS_NON_CALLEE_CLOBBERS to true unconditionally.
So, it seems that it might be necessary to find some way to adjust
CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe ---
unfortunately, wider testing showed sanitiser fails - so this has been reverted
for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #43 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830
commit r12-103-gb6600392bf71c4a9785f8f49948b611425896830
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.4|8.5
--- Comment #42 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #41 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #40)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38)
> > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> > > > Oh, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #40 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #39)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> > > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #38)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> > Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't
> > seem
> > to reproduce the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #38 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #37)
> Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem
> to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to
> ___UTF_8_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener ---
Oh, and FYI a cc1 cross from x86_64 to x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0 doesn't seem
to reproduce the issue with the reduced testcase (I seee no call to
___UTF_8_put remaining with -O3 -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #36 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #35)
> Which means another possible candidate for the "bug" is darwin_binds_local_p
yeah... see below.
> > > .. but something similar must apply to PLT and targets w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #35 from Richard Biener ---
Which means another possible candidate for the "bug" is darwin_binds_local_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #34 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31)
> > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30)
> > > > (In rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #31)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #29)
> > > what is also somewhat peculiar is that replacing the first funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #30)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #29)
> > what is also somewhat peculiar is that replacing the first function in the
> > reduced test case with "extern voi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[10.3, 11, 12 Re
28 matches
Mail list logo