--- Comment #15 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-13 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if
--- Comment #14 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 18:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 17:19 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 17:19
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #12 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-08 16:43 ---
*** Bug 26406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #11 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-06 17:21 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:10 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 17:10
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> As I've mentioned at least 3 times now, the Ada mis-compilations
> have priority. I'm working on these between fixing Ada issues.
> When there's status worth mentioning, I'll certainly a
--- Comment #9 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-06 15:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 15:29 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-0
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 15:29 ---
Any news on these three testsuite failures? It is getting annoying to have
testsuite regressions.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #7 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2006-03-05
15:27 ---
seen also on amd64 with r111705
--
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 21:19 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:43 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Just tar up the mess and pass them to me directly.
I will once the testsuite has finished running.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-02-17 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 18:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030730-1.c scan-tree-dump-times if
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:25 ---
Shows up on ia64 also:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg00886.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:24 ---
Maybe even between 72 and 75.
Which means the following change cause this:
2006-02-16 Jeff Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * tree-vrp.c (set_value_range_to_nonnegative): New function.
+ (vrp_expr_co
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-17 18:22 ---
They were introduced between 29 and 75.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
17 matches
Mail list logo