https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151
--- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Working on a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64249
Bug ID: 64249
Summary: Missing warning for if (A) else if (A)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:20:43 2014
New Revision: 218560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (range_entry_cm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:24:22 2014
New Revision: 218561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (range_entry_cm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:29:44 2014
New Revision: 218562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61686
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (range_entry_cm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61686
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #43 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Dec 10 08:31:32 2014
New Revision: 218563
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218563&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53513
* doc/extend.texi (__builtin_sh_set_fpscr): F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64250
Bug ID: 64250
Summary: Missing warning for "if (AA && AA)" / same expression
multiple times used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64250
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63413
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63594
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 10 09:00:50 2014
New Revision: 218565
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218565&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63594
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_dupv4sf): Move after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Warn for P && P and P || P |Warn for P && P and P || P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Dec 10 09:29:05 2014
New Revision: 218566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64191
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64191
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #61 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #60)
> Ok, so I have a patch that teaches LIM to move the division by using the
> value-range information we now store.
Which can't be done this way ... (the value-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, matt at gwalski dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
>
> Bug ID: 64246
>Summary: [5 Regression] ICE building libada for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #46 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
Bug ID: 64251
Summary: [5 Regression] Chromium build error only with
--enable-checking=yes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64252
Bug ID: 64252
Summary: [5 Regression] expand_vec_perm_pblendv caused
miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For example:
markus@x4 /tmp % cat foo.ii
class DictionaryValue {};
template void CreateValue(T) {
DictionaryValue(0);
CreateValue(0);
}
markus@x4 /tmp % checking-release/g++ -st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #47 from Jiong Wang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #44)
> (In reply to Sandra Loosemore from comment #43)
> > I'm seeing the same errors as in Comment 8 (complaints about arrays with
> > negative sizes) when building a cr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63950
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64160
--- Comment #5 from Peter A. Bigot ---
Thanks, Ulrich: that's a better explanation of what makes me uncomfortable with
that part of the machine description.
We have a complex split pattern that's the sole user of an idiosyncratic
predicate. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:22:34 2014
New Revision: 218571
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218571&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64100
* typeck.c (lookup_destructor): Handle incomplete type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64249
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64100
--- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:26:47 2014
New Revision: 218572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64100
* g++.dg/template/pr64100.C: New file.
Added:
trun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:29:22 2014
New Revision: 218573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64127
* parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose_invalid_type_name): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Dec 10 11:32:00 2014
New Revision: 218574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64127
* g++.dg/cpp/pr64127.C: New file.
Added:
trunk/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64127
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59765
Alexander Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.vogt at fulguritus dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #62 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 34238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34238&action=edit
frontend patch
So the issue is that the division is executed conditionally because it is
placed
after the loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #63 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 34239
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34239&action=edit
LIM patch
This is a patch to loop invariant motion I was playing with to use range
information to move a stmt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64248
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Are you sure you are not using uninitialized memory? try using the various
-fsanitize flags (not sure if uninit memory use is in =address or =undefined).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64247
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Are you sure you are not using uninitialized memory? try using the various
> -fsanitize flags (not sure if uninit memory use is in =address or
> =undefine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067
Bug 57067 depends on bug 56982, which changed state.
Bug 56982 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bad optimization with setjmp()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57481
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Bug 5 depends on bug 57511, which changed state.
Bug 57511 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Missing SCEV final value replacement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57511
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57518
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57985
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58048
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58170
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58369
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58375
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58545
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59248
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59374
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61068
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62284
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62642
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63584
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |---
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #8 from Jo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64239
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62021
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64239
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
match_results::swap() fails to handle _M_in_iterator as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Bug ID: 64253
Summary: [5 Regression] IPA inline analysis processes a code
transform operation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64253
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is probably latent on branches (where nobody cares though).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Dec 10 14:07:47 2014
New Revision: 218578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/63909
* gimple-iterator.h (gsi_start_bb_nondebug): New fun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57689
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
sorry, can't say anymore. Debian dropped ia64, and I don't have access anymore
to any hardware.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirme
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo