https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394
--- Comment #15 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> > Whether or not to fix as well as whether or not to warn at -O0 are a topic
> > of debate. I'm not sure I'm up f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
Bug ID: 89768
Summary: ICE in compare_and_jump_seq at loop-unroll.c:838
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89726
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 19 07:25:59 2019
New Revision: 269790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89726
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_floorcei
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89720
--- Comment #7 from Steinar H. Gunderson ---
The inlining context, yes. Thanks for pointing out the relevant bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89747
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89753
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 19 08:06:48 2019
New Revision: 269791
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269791&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89753
* loop-unroll.c (decide_unro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89753
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Mar 19 08:10:08 2019
New Revision: 269792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89753
* loop-unroll.c (decide_unro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89753
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 19 08:11:25 2019
New Revision: 269793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89752
* gimplify.c (gimplify_asm_expr): For out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the originally provided testcase, not on the #c7 testcase, that needs
to be fixed in LRA not to try to reload BLKmode MEMs into REGs.
from Martin Liška ---
I can reproduce that, but only with GCC tip:
gcc version 8.3.1 20190319 (GCC)
$ ./xg++ -B. /home/marxin/Programming/testcases/pr89766.cpp -c -fchecking
-std=c++17 --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
/home/marxin/Programming/testcases/pr89766.cpp:7:47
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
@RJ: Btw. do you see the ICE also for a valid C++ code? The test-case you
provided isn't valid if I'm correct?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
--- Comment #4 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
@Martin: Yes, ICE happens for valid code too only if -fchecking=1. Reduced
cases are invalid and rejected by 9.0.1 20190319 and 8.2.1 20181127.
However 8.3.1 20190319 accepts them even for -fchecking=0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Rimvydas (RJ) from comment #4)
> @Martin: Yes, ICE happens for valid code too only if -fchecking=1. Reduced
> cases are invalid and rejected by 9.0.1 20190319 and 8.2.1 20181127.
> Howe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #7 from Jaku
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
--- Comment #8 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
Created attachment 45995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45995&action=edit
Compressed original case (3.3M).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89762
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #9 from Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 45996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45996&action=edit
gcc9-pr89768.patch
Full patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89571
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89506
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 19 10:05:10 2019
New Revision: 269795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89506
* config/arm/arm.md (cmpsi2_addneg): Swap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88389
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The following patch fixes the remaining ICE for me:
--- gcc/lra-constraints.c.jj2019-03-16 22:17:21.060937047 +0100
+++ gcc/lra-constraints.c 2019-03-19 11:49:11.982058568 +0100
@@ -2350,6 +2350,8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89764
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
Bug ID: 89769
Summary: attribute((aligned(x))) array testcae run error with
option -fno-tree-loop-im
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89644
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- pr89769.c.126t.pre_ 2019-03-19 07:17:59.0 -0400
+++ pr89769.c.126t.pre 2019-03-19 07:18:28.0 -0400
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ main ()
goto ;
:
- pretmp_5 = bid_Kx192[1].w[1];
+ pretmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
GCC 7.x and earlier used to do:
/* The local structure or class can't use parameters of
the containing function anyway. */
if (DECL_CONTEXT (oldlocal) != current_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67070
Godeffroy Valet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||godeffroy.valet at m4x dot org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Tue Mar 19 13:44:03 2019
New Revision: 269796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-03-19 Kelvin Nilsen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89493
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89607
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, so the reason why __t PARM_DECL is not normally removed is that we reuse
IDENTIFIER_MARKED for something different, in particular:
/* If TREE_TYPE isn't set, we're still in the introducer, so check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89762
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
The patch can't be backported since it depends on the rest of type
simplification infrastructure that is GCC 9 only. I will take a look why
registration fails - it looks like the patch above only works around
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89335
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Mar 19 14:53:43 2019
New Revision: 269799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/87809
PR lto/89335
* tree.c (free_lang_dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87809
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Mar 19 14:53:43 2019
New Revision: 269799
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269799&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/87809
PR lto/89335
* tree.c (free_lang_dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88389
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 19 14:57:18 2019
New Revision: 269800
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269800&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-19 Richard Biener
PR debug/88389
* opts.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89736
kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89335
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87089
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89335
Bug 89335 depends on bug 87089, which changed state.
Bug 87089 Summary: [9 regression] tree check: expected class 'type', have
'declaration' (namespace_decl) in type_with_linkage_p, at ipa-utils.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
Hedayat Vatankhah changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hedayat.fwd at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89693
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89726
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] |[7/8 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 19 16:10:59 2019
New Revision: 269801
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269801&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/89378
* config/mips/mips.c (mips_expand_vec_cond
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89751
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
--- Comment #4 from Paul Smith ---
Oops sorry: I guess I'm not familiar enough with the vagaries of the bug
trackers :). Thanks Jonathan!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89746
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Mar 19 16:58:42 2019
New Revision: 269802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
rs6000: Unaligned stfiwx on older CPUs (PR89746)
The "classic" Powe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85965
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No problem, it's not the reporter's responsibility to categorise it correctly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89737
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 19 17:08:28 2019
New Revision: 269804
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269804&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix set of even probabilities (PR middle-end/89737).
2019-03-19 Martin L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89737
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89762
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89770
Bug ID: 89770
Summary: move java-related mailing lists on lists.html to the
"Historical lists" section
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89644
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Mar 19 17:45:34 2019
New Revision: 269807
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269807&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89644 - False-positive -Warray-bounds diagnostic on
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89644
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression]|[8 Regression]
|false-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88389
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 19 17:46:22 2019
New Revision: 269808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-19 Richard Biener
PR debug/88389
* opts.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88389
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Mitigated for GCC 8+ by ignoring -gsplit-dwarf with -flto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87145
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89644
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Tue Mar 19 18:35:42 2019
New Revision: 269809
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269809&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/89644 - false-positive -Warray-bounds on strncpy with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 19 19:04:14 2019
New Revision: 269812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/89768
* loop-unroll.c (unroll_loop_con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89769
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Isn't this a dup of bug 43798 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89771
Bug ID: 89771
Summary: [9 regression] c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c fails starting
with r269807
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87145
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
The fix for 77656 caused us to call convert_nontype_argument even for
value-dependent arguments, to perform the conversion in order to avoid a bogus
warning.
In this case, the argument is Pod{N}. The call t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83515
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #7)
The following patch fixes the ICE:
Index: trans-types.c
===
--- trans-types.c (revision 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87145
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
It's _strict since https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02144.html --
that was a desirable change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89601
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 89601, which changed state.
Bug 89601 Summary: [8 Regression] [PDT] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
resolve_component)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89601
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89411
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Tue Mar 19 22:33:34 2019
New Revision: 269813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
RISC-V: Fix %lo overflow with BLKmode references.
gcc/
PR t
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo