Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:51:08PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>> wrote:
>>
>> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
>> > index 16c51a8..958c667 100644
>> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:51:08PM +, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> > index 16c51a8..958c667 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/
On 6 February 2014 22:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> index 16c51a8..958c667 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> @@ -1187,14 +1187,10 @@ aarch64_pass_by_reference (cumulativ
Ramana Radhakrishnan writes:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
>> a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
>> end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
> a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
> end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as c-torture-execute
> does, then I thin
Ping? I'm attaching a marginally cleaner version of the test. I've had
a look at integrating this into aapcs64.exp but got defeated in the
end. If go-torture-execute took a list of sources as c-torture-execute
does, then I think adding something like this to aapcs64.exp would work:
# Test passi
Am 17.01.2014 19:50, schrieb Yufeng Zhang:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for the fix. The patch looks OK to me in general, although I have some
> minor comments below.
>
> On 01/17/14 08:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> Hi, as discussed inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
>> GCC cur
> "Michael" == Michael Hudson-Doyle writes:
>> My preferred languages for these tests would be (in approximate order)
>> c, c++, fortran, java, ada, go. That order is based on which languages
>> are tested most by users.
Michael> Well of course it cannot be done in C or C++. A commenter on
Richard Earnshaw writes:
> On 17/01/14 23:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>>> wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, "Yufeng Zhang" wrote:
>
> Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It
On 17/01/14 23:56, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, "Yufeng Zhang" wrote:
Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It may not be that
straightforward
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, "Yufeng Zhang" wrote:
>>>
>>> Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It may not be that
>>> straightforward to add non-C/C++ tests, but give it a try.
>>
>> Can you
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
>
> On 18 Jan 2014 07:50, "Yufeng Zhang" wrote:
>>
>> Also can you please try to add some new test(s)? It may not be that
>> straightforward to add non-C/C++ tests, but give it a try.
>
> Can you give some hints? Like at least where i
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the fix. The patch looks OK to me in general, although I
have some minor comments below.
On 01/17/14 08:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
Hi, as discussed inhttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
GCC currently gets a detail of the AArch64 ABI wrong: arrays are
Hi, as discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59799
GCC currently gets a detail of the AArch64 ABI wrong: arrays are not
always passed by reference. Fortunately the fix is rather easy...
I guess this is an ABI break but my understand there has been no release
of GCC which suppor
14 matches
Mail list logo
