[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test-06.txt

Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-mp

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-mip4-reg-tunnel-03.txt

Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-mi

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 31 August 2006

Hi all, Here's this week's LC assignments along with one Early Review assignment: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html Thanks, Mary. --- Reviewer: David Black - 'End-to-middle Security in

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-rddp-ddp-06.txt

In your previous mail you wrote: As you suggested, I did contact the IESG, specifically the Security ADs, about IKEv1 vs. IKEv2, and the verdict is to stick with IKEv1 as profiled by RFC 3723 for iSCSI so that iSCSI and RDDP use the same profile of IPsec. If/when RFC 3723 is updated,

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-ospf-iana-01.txt

no-objection ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of: draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req-04.txt

There have been very varied reactions to this draft. John isn't the only person to find it unclear. I found that it explained NetLMM to me quite well. Obviously a case of YMMV. Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that Brian has already issued his ballot on this, but I had written-up s

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-clancy-eap-pax-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-clancy-eap-pax-09.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Summary: =

[Gen-art] review of: draft-ietf-netlmm-nohost-req-04.txt

I noticed that Brian has already issued his ballot on this, but I had written-up some rough comments on this, so I'm sending them for completeness sake. These are mostly nits, but I generally have to say that overall, the document doesn't seem very readable. 1) Contributor section at the beginnin

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-abel-nfc-urn-00.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-abel-nfc-urn-00.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please wait for direction from your document shepherd before posting a new version of the draft. Summary: This draft fol

Re: [Gen-art] Review assignments for 31 Aug 2006

Not to worry. I will trust my fellow ADs on this one. Brian Michael A. Patton wrote: I've been having a number of computer and connectivity problems recently. This means that my normal load of paying work is taking longer and I won't have any time this week to review the document I was ass

Re: [Gen-art] Review assignments for 31 Aug 2006

I've taken a quick look at this one and sent in a review. /Elwyn Michael A. Patton wrote: I've been having a number of computer and connectivity problems recently. This means that my normal load of paying work is taking longer and I won't have any time this week to review the document I was ass

Re: [Gen-art] Review draft-vaudreuil-futuredelivery-04.txt

Note that the only really arguable point, to propose both interval and date, is well explained in the document (different usages/contexts need different mechanism) and there is no reason to not trust the WG (cf the acknowledgments) about this. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] (just back from holidays) _