[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Rave into the Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Ate Douma
On 25/02/11 01:08, Ate Douma wrote: Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator. The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal The vote passes with a total of 29 +1 vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept Howl as an Incubator Project

2011-02-28 Thread Alan Gates
With 9 binding +1 votes and no -1s, the vote passes. I'll take the naming issue back to the Howl contributors to discuss what we want to do about it. What's the next step now? Alan. On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Alan Gates wrote: I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an Incubat

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Bertrand, > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> > > My point was that the technical reasons listed in this thread don't > seem to warrant forking MRUnit into its own project, Meh, arguably they do. One of the big issues is release cycles. It takes a ton

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Ant, On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:18 AM, ant elder wrote: > > You're right about the entry criteria, there's a very low bar to > becoming an Incubator poddling so if you all really want to I'm pretty > sure you'll be able to make it happen. But this is a proposal > discussion thread which asks for fe

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Chris, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > The Hadoop community has been VOTE'ing over the past month to abandon > development of portions of their code base... > ...A few of us members (myself, Patrick and Nige) were willing to step up and > volunteer that in

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread ant elder
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Guys, > >>> >>> I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for >>> a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce >>> seems like it would help give it a better chance of long term

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Guys, >> >> I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for >> a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce >> seems like it would help give it a better chance of long term survival >> to me. Wouldn't simply moving mrunit out from >> hadoop/map

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRUnit entry into the Apache Incubator

2011-02-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > >> == Rationale == >> MRUnit has existed as a contrib component of Apache Hadoop. This has served >> to introduce users to the library and to provide necessary functionality to >> developers