On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We
> have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community doesn't
> work. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, but very hard to do.
Understood. On the o
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:41 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> On Jun 14, 2016 4:10 PM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote:
>
> > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> > Apach
+1 binding.
I checked the following:
- hashes
- gpg signature
- builds from source
- LICENSE file
- NOTICE file
- Source code headers
- no stray binaries
- release has incubating in version number
- Drew
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:03 AM Darin Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Myriad communi
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> That's what I figured. We could just go straight to TLP I suppose, if you
> guys honestly don't think the Incubator would help. Is there any harm going
> through the incubator?
>
No harm at all. It will increase visibility to a particularly
I'm happy to announce that the Apache Incubator has unanimously approved
this release.
There are 6 approving votes, all of which are binding:
* Sergio Fernández
* Jakob Homan
* Julian Hyde
* Justin Mclean
* Jean-Baptiste Onofré
* Seetharam Venkatesh
There are no disapproving votes.
We'll proceed
This vote is now complete. We'll summarize the results and next steps in
the [RESULT] thread.
Thanks everyone!
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> + sigs look good
> + LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good
> + licenses in source and xml files look good.
> + t
+1 (binding)
On Jun 14, 2016 4:10 PM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote:
> Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PirkProposal
>
>
That's what I figured. We could just go straight to TLP I suppose, if you
guys honestly don't think the Incubator would help. Is there any harm going
through the incubator? I don't want to reignite the "straight to TLP"
debate.
We honestly need some help/advice getting more folks involved. There h
I don't think that there is a good definition of empty. The smaller the
initial community, the larger the effort to bootstrap is the observation,
but we don't really have a magic rule to apply.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:55 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> What do we consider "empty"? Is there some ob
What do we consider "empty"? Is there some observed "critical mass"? Right
now I believe we are 4 (to contribute), but they have had users for a long
time.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Generally speaking, incubation is to nurture a community to adopting the
> Apache Way
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We
> have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community doesn't
> work. It doesn't mean that it's impossible, but very hard to do.
>
Frankly, the except
Generally speaking, incubation is to nurture a community to adopting the
Apache Way. This includes self governance, community growth and licensing
policies.
We generally expect some kind of backing community to bring this to. We
have seen pretty consistently that starting from an empty community
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Good luck guys
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
> > Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> > mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on ac
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/inc
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
> mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PirkPropos
Binding vote
D
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>
> [ X ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general
Since discussion has died down and we have gotten a couple of additional
mentor volunteers, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting Pirk into the
Apache Incubator.
Proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PirkProposal
[ ] +1 Accept Pirk into the Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Abstain.
[ ] -1 Do not
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:25 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> We (the Commons PMC) have not decided yet what to do, but I just wanted to
> gauge the interest in joining the math IPMC if we choose to go TLP by way
> of the incubator. The idea would be that math (whatever its name may be),
> would go thro
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of
> the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they
> didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them enough
> additional contr
Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of
the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they
didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them enough
additional contributors. That made it seem like the project should go
forward
I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted to make Math
a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved with Commons Math
felt that a TLP at the ASF would not work for them, so they forked the project
and left, effectively voiding the TLP vote since the proposed
Hi J-D,
I would like to get this started especially now that UPSERT and Spark SQL
DataFrames support. But, how do I use Cloudera Manager to deploy it? Is there a
parcel available yet? Is there a new CSD file to be downloaded? I currently
have CM 5.7.0 installed.
Thanks,
Ben
> On Jun 10, 201
22 matches
Mail list logo