Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi, A bit of status. Most of the infrastructure is created. The Jira space is waiting for a reboot of the system and will only be available next Tue. The git repo is however available and we can start the code grant process (by litbit, whom afaik owns the IP). Committers should continue to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi Hadrian, thanks so much for setting up the infrastructure. I will ask the remaining individuals to submit their ICLA and also ask Litbit to submit it’s CCLA. I will likely volunteer to take care of the initial admin duties until we get a flow of communication and a decision making via the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi, > Is the code grant process you are referring to below the CCLA or is it an > additional requirement? CCLA are optional [1][2], software grants [3][4] are required. So yes that’s an additional requirement, SG give the ASF the rights to use to code that is donated. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi Hadrian, thanks for setting this all up. I have already sent in my ICLA and I hope that the other contributors will follow this week. We are working on our corporate CLA and that too should be in place soon. We are excited about the creation of this community and we look forward to others

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi Tony, Reza, I found time this weekend to setup the iota podling. The proposal is now listed in the index or proposals [1]. The project status page [2] is setup and listed in the incubator list [3]. I will maintain the status page in the early phases. I created an issue for infra to create

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Vote passes with: [10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre, jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor, hadrian [ 3] +1 - (non-binding) [ 0] 0 - [ 0] -1 - Congrats to the iota community and welcome to the ASF. I will work with the iota community and our infra to get the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

This is great news we look forward to creating a vibrant community with you all. -Tony > On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > Vote passes with: > [10] +1 - amareshwari, jmclean, hthomann, humbedooh, sterling, jbonofre, > jhyde, venkatesh, jamestaylor,

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Julian > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this >> thread went unnoticed. >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Thanks! On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Julian > > > On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Interesting proposal and I love the name. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:49 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Julian > > > > > On Jan

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

HI, +1 binding Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). -jakob On 19 January 2016 at 13:45, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > +1 binding > > Thanks, > Justin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:26 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > +1 (binding) > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this >> thread went unnoticed. >> >> Cheers, >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) With regards, Daniel. On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this > thread went unnoticed. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> The vote is as usually open for at least

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 01/19/2016 01:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this thread went unnoticed. Cheers, Hadrian On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1.

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

I want to encourage more IPMC members to cast a vote, in case this thread went unnoticed. Cheers, Hadrian On 01/16/2016 03:40 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Hadrian On 01/16/2016 03:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi, The iota

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Naresh Agarwal On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. >> >> Because of the naming

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi, The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache iota" (the greek

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Naresh Agarwal wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks > Naresh Agarwal > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (Binding) On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Hi, > > The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. > > Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change > name at graduation, the project name was

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi, The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache iota" (the greek

Re: [VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

The vote is as usually open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Hadrian On 01/16/2016 03:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Hi, The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change name at graduation,

[VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

Hi, The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago. Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to change name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache iota" (the greek letter), which resonates better with the IoT field the project