Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: | On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: |> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) |> # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. |> # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. |> dev-libs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Leverton wrote: | On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: |> Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? |> |> I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my |> system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

On 05-06-2008 22:47:28 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: > > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > > # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > > # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. > > dev-libs/libffi > > de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote: > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. > dev-libs/libffi > dev-lang/squeak > x11-libs/gtk-server The latest version of g-wrap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Samuli Suominen wrote: | # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) | # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. | # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. | dev-libs/libffi | dev-lang/squeak | x11-libs/gtk-server | | Squ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:54 +0100, David Leverton wrote: > On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: > > Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? > > > > I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my > > system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. > > Acco

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:21:24 +0300 Albert Zeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti: > > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > > # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > > # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

On Thursday 05 June 2008 19:21:24 Albert Zeyer wrote: > Are you sure that Squeak really depends on libffi? > > I just compiled it (squeak-3.9.7) fine without having libffi on my > system and with disabled libffi USE-flag. According to my reading of the code, it doesn't use libffi on x86-linux, pp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:52 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) > # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. > # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. > dev-libs/libffi > dev-lang/squeak > x11-libs/gtk-server > > Squeak and gtk

[gentoo-dev] Lastriting dev-libs/libffi (replaced by USE libffi in gcc itself)

# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (05 Jun 2008) # Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners. # Replaced by USE libffi in sys-devel/gcc. Bug 163724. dev-libs/libffi dev-lang/squeak x11-libs/gtk-server Squeak and gtk-server maintainers still have time to rescue their ebuild, just enough tim