Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.14 -0400, Tanstaafl ha scritto:
>
>
> For those of us who prefer to stay with the stable portage, am I
> correct
> that once the 2.1.9 portage series goes stable, that we would then
> remove the above from /etc/portage/bashrc? What would happen if I
> forgot
> to
Daniel Troeder admin-box.com> writes:
> $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/xyz
> To use compression, just mount with "-o compress".
> /etc/fstab:
> /dev/mapper/vg0-portage /gentoo btrfs noatime,compress 0 2
> I installed sys-fs/btrfs-progs-0.19-r1 and I have the 'acl' flag on.
Fair enough,
thanks
James
On 2010-09-29 6:40 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> First of all, you should install lafilefixer and let it pass through the
> currently-installed system:
>
> # emerge lafilefixer
> # lafilefixer --justfixit
>
> This will convert the references to libtool archives to the -llibname
> form, which wo
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sunday 03 October 2010, Dale wrote:
Hi,
KDE 4.5.2 hit the tree. It is still masked and/or keyworded but
anyway. Since I have them in my unmask/keyword file, portage wants to
upgrade. Thing is, it seems none of the mirrors have the tarballs for
4.5.2.
I als
On Sunday 03 October 2010, Dale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> KDE 4.5.2 hit the tree. It is still masked and/or keyworded but
> anyway. Since I have them in my unmask/keyword file, portage wants to
> upgrade. Thing is, it seems none of the mirrors have the tarballs for
> 4.5.2.
>
> I also googled for some
Hi,
KDE 4.5.2 hit the tree. It is still masked and/or keyworded but
anyway. Since I have them in my unmask/keyword file, portage wants to
upgrade. Thing is, it seems none of the mirrors have the tarballs for
4.5.2.
I also googled for some of them too. I was hoping I could download some
On 10/01/2010 04:40 PM, James wrote:
> Daniel Troeder admin-box.com> writes:
>
>
>> As I read about the nice performance of btrfs with compression I tried
>> it out two weeks ago. I'll be posting my benchmarks to this list soon.
>> Until now I didn't have any problems, but still would not use bt
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 09.56 -0500, Dale ha scritto:
Still on topic but I have a question and you are in the know on
this.
I'm running unstable portage, 2.2_rc67 to be exact. Does this new a
version of portage take care of this already? It sounds like it i
On Saturday 02 October 2010 15:17:01 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Mick [10-10-02 13:52]:
> > On Saturday 02 October 2010 11:31:38 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > fetchmail's log told me, that there is something wrong with the setup
> > > of the certificats.
> > >
> > > In the lo
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:00:33 -0600
Darren Kirby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Dale wrote:
> > Al wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I want to find out by which file and line the */temp/environment
> >> script is run or sourced.
> >>
> >> As a am always interested in a general way to sol
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 09.56 -0500, Dale ha scritto:
>
> Still on topic but I have a question and you are in the know on
> this.
> I'm running unstable portage, 2.2_rc67 to be exact. Does this new a
> version of portage take care of this already? It sounds like it is
> the
> stable p
Am 02.10.2010 14:44, schrieb Florian Philipp:
> Am 02.10.2010 14:11, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> [...]
>>>
>>> Assumptions:
>>>
>>> 1. Seek time is constant. For HDDs we can take an average value. Of
>>> course this doesn't work for tapes.
Still on topic but I have a question and you are in the know on this.
I'm running unstable portage, 2.2_rc67 to be exact. Does this new a
version of portage take care of this already? It sounds like it is the
stable portage that has issues. I been running unstable for a long
while now.
T
Mick [10-10-02 13:52]:
> On Saturday 02 October 2010 11:31:38 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > fetchmail's log told me, that there is something wrong with the setup
> > of the certificats.
> >
> > In the log there is the following section
> > fetchmail: Server certificate:
> >
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.51 +0800, William Kenworthy ha
> scritto:
>> What are the implications of adding this "snippet" - will it come back
>> to bite us (users) when the next version of portage comes along?
>>
> No, it'll waste
Am 02.10.2010 14:11, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Assumptions:
>>
>> 1. Seek time is constant. For HDDs we can take an average value. Of
>> course this doesn't work for tapes. They have a seek time which
>> increases linearly with t
Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.51 +0800, William Kenworthy ha
scritto:
> What are the implications of adding this "snippet" - will it come back
> to bite us (users) when the next version of portage comes along?
>
No, it'll waste a bit of time if it's not removed because the same logic
is runnin
On Saturday 02 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 01.10.2010 18:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > On Friday 01 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
> >> Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
> >>> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
> >>>
> >>> So does that then mean that m
Am 01.10.2010 18:23, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> On Friday 01 October 2010, Florian Philipp wrote:
>> Am 01.10.2010 03:12, schrieb Adam Carter:
>>> Your harddisk seeks, everything is slow.
>>>
>>> So does that then mean that my options are;
>>> 1. Defragment, so there is less seeking
>>> 2.
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 00:40 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Hi all users,
>
> Secondly, you can avoid any future requirement for this by sanitising
> the newly installed .la files; this can be done either by using the
> (currently testing) Portage 2.1.9 series, or by adding the following
> sni
On Saturday 02 October 2010 11:31:38 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fetchmail's log told me, that there is something wrong with the setup
> of the certificats.
>
> In the log there is the following section
> fetchmail: Server certificate:
> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Thawte Con
Hi,
fetchmail's log told me, that there is something wrong with the setup
of the certificats.
In the log there is the following section
fetchmail: Server certificate:
fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Thawte Consulting cc
fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: Thawte Premium Server CA
fetchm
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 03:16:24 +0100 Stroller
wrote:
>
> On 1 Oct 2010, at 23:18, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:13:24 + (UTC) Grant Edwards
> > wrote:
> >> I've noticed recently that the Gentoo handbook web pages are
> >> ridiculously wide. (It seems to me that they didn't u
23 matches
Mail list logo
