> That fixed it. Thank you very much. I'm a little puzzled because I
> don't get the "unable to apply firmware patch" messages on my desktop
> which also uses the r8169 driver and doesn't have linux-firmware
> installed.
Maybe you have an older firmware installed from a different package?
Run em
Hi there,
I kinda feel I'm opening myself up for ridicule in asking this, but I'm on x86
"stable" (i.e. not ~x86) and this behaviour seems to have changed recently.
During a recent `emerge --sync` I received the "an update to portage is
available - you're strongly advised to take it" message.
On Saturday 30 July 2011 15:50:11 Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
> > power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
>
> That would suck. I sure did hate to lose my videos. I bet AT&T does to
> since I have to go fin
> I remembered that i also had started having a problem with my intel
> wireless card, and it looks like both the intel and realtek firmwares
> are now in linux-firmware so try emerging that.
That fixed it. Thank you very much. I'm a little puzzled because I
don't get the "unable to apply firmwa
Hello!
I got x11-themes/gtk-engines:3 from the gnome overlay installed so GTK 3
engines are there. My problem is I don't know how to set a global theme
for GTK 3 (and the default is dead ugly). If it is file
~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini then I haven't got that to work, yet.
What's your recip
On 07/30/2011 12:42 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Hello list!
I've noticed the following in my rc.log file:
[file system mounting ...]
opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks
fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup«
* Operational error
The backup disk is the only one (besides boot a
On 2011-07-29, BRM wrote:
>>From: Paul Hartman
>>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>>Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
>>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> I noticed this today:
>>>
>>> The following mask changes are ne
Peter Humphrey wrote:
One thing's certain: it's a good test of the USB disk! I just hope your
power incident doesn't happen to me too. :-)
That would suck. I sure did hate to lose my videos. I bet AT&T does to
since I have to go find them and download them again. :/
Dale
:-) :-)
Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Dale wrote:
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age Always
- 0
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000Old_age Always
- 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000
On Saturday 30 July 2011 00:06:57 Dale wrote:
> I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
> has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
I'm in a similar process. I have an external disk which I use to back my
boxes up. I need a bootable vfat partition for the W
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Dale wrote:
> 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always
> - 0
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always
> - 0
> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 100 100 000 Old_age Offlin
pk wrote:
On 2011-07-30 01:06, Dale wrote:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
http://www.rootninja.com/dd-with-a-progress-bar/
(emerge sys-apps/pv)
Disclaimer: I haven't used this myself...
HTH
Michael Mol wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
giving it a fresh start. I
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Florian Philipp wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I've noticed the following in my rc.log file:
> [file system mounting ...]
> opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks
> fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup«
> * Operational error
>
> The backup disk is the o
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
giving it a fresh start. I just don't get how this could have caused a
kernel panic. T
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
>
>> What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
>> don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
>> giving it a fresh start. I just don't get how th
On Saturday 30 July 2011 11:17:52 Dale wrote:
> What could have caused this? Could it be a file system problem? I
> don't think it is a physical failure since it is working now after
> giving it a fresh start. I just don't get how this could have caused a
> kernel panic. This is plain weird.
On 30.07.11 02:11, Manuel McLure wrote:
> FYI, netatalk 2.1.5 for AFP (I don't use anything else) is working for
> me here with OS X Lion.
That's interesting, I can't seem to connect to Netatalk 2.1.5 with Lion.
Would you perhaps share the contents of your /etc/netatalk folder?
-Ralph
On 2011-07-30 01:06, Dale wrote:
> I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
> has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
http://www.rootninja.com/dd-with-a-progress-bar/
(emerge sys-apps/pv)
Disclaimer: I haven't used this myself...
HTH
Best regards
Peter
Mick wrote:
On Saturday 30 Jul 2011 01:32:07 Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
dcfldd has a progress indicator
On 2011-07-30 03:04, james wrote:
> Ok so my first issue is the installation media
> and a lack of tools for GPT (GUID Partition Table).
> the "4k block" (GPT) issue? Maybe I missed it
> on the minimal CD?
If you're after GPT-able partition software you can use (g)parted,
available on the Gen
On Saturday 30 Jul 2011 01:32:07 Dale wrote:
> Alex Schuster wrote:
> > Am 30.07.2011 01:06, schrieb Dale:
> >> I'm just curious as to how much longer dd is going to take. I wish it
> >> has some sort of a progress bar or something. :/
dcfldd has a progress indicator AFAIR.
To make sure that yo
Hello list!
I've noticed the following in my rc.log file:
[file system mounting ...]
opt: clean, 3127/6496 files, 108510/209920 blocks
fsck.ext4: Unable to resolve »LABEL=backup«
* Operational error
The backup disk is the only one (besides boot and root) which is mounted
by label. After booting,
Am 29.07.2011 20:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
> Something that's been tickling my brain for a couple years now, and
> you guys are probably the right ones to ask.
>
> I haven't dropped coin for an SSD (yet), but I was wondering about
> uses for them beyond using them for / or /home.
>
> 1) What about
> My laptop's "Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express
> Gigabit Ethernet controller" uses the r8169 driver. On kernel 2.6.36
> it works fine, but on 2.6.38 and 2.6.39 it doesn't work and
> continuously outputs "eth0: unable to apply firmware patch" to dmesg.
> I found this worka
I remembered that i also had started having a problem with my intel
wireless card, and it looks like both the intel and realtek firmwares
are now in linux-firmware so try emerging that.
26 matches
Mail list logo