Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:11:32 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may > > be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all > > yours. > > Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just want to know whether it's > safe t

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:11:25 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote: > >> On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >>> There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question... > >> > >> Good reason? I don't understand. > > > > He meant he didn't have an answer for you. > > Ah, I se

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner leftovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Thanasis wrote: > Shouldn't all participating in this thread have corrected by now the > message's subject, for archiving purposes? > > Thanks for spotting and correcting it.

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner leftovers

Shouldn't all participating in this thread have corrected by now the message's subject, for archiving purposes?

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 12:13:25 schrieb Alexander Kapshuk: > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > > > * Finding left over modules and header > > > > * The following files remain. These were either installe

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 12:13:25 schrieb Alexander Kapshuk: > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > * Finding left over modules and header > > * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand > * or edited. This script cannot deal with them. > > /usr/

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 14/02/2015 17:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > > > On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated t

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On 14/02/2015 17:42, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > > > * Finding left over modules a

[gentoo-user] Re: rpm or deb package installs

Bill Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes: > rpm is just a wrapper around a an archive with instructions on how to > build and or install it. I have more experience with rpm's but I > believe debs are the same. Just unwrap your .rpm/.deb file of choice > and install it manually (the binaries/code ar

Re: [gentoo-user] printing over VPN

On 02/13/2015 10:44 PM, Joseph wrote: > > Thank for replying. > > My eeepc VPN IP: 192.168.151.9 is the client connected over VPN to server > VPN IP 192.168.151.1 > > So I inserted on eeepc (client) to /etc/openvpn/eeepc.conf > ... > push "route 192.168.151.0 255.255.255.0" This goes on th

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > > > * Finding left over modules and header > > > > * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand > > * or edite

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On 14/02/2015 13:13, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > * Finding left over modules and header > > * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand > * or edited. This script cannot deal with them. > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_per

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On 14/02/2015 16:11, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 14 February 2015 11:53:23 Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may >> be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all >> yours. > > Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On 02/14/2015 03:52 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Jan Sever wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed >> files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums >> (for equery check) from install

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Jan Sever wrote: > Hi all, > > I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed > files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums > (for equery check) from installed files in /, or in /var/tmp/portage. And > simila

[gentoo-user] Re: rpm or deb package installs

Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > I see you are doing more than I thought you were doing > > rpms and debs are both cpio files so the easy way is to unpack them and > see what's going on: > > rpm2cpio name.rpm | cpio -iv --make-directories > dpkg -x somepackage.deb ~/temp/ > > Considering t

[gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority

On 13/02/15 20:52, James wrote: Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes: I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. "repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it; but it's brand new to me [...] Does this system effect "epatch user", as in where the patches are pl

[gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority

On 13/02/15 22:16, Andrew Savchenko wrote: On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:29:07 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. I now have a file /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf: [Local] location = /usr/local/portage auto-sync = no And removed

[gentoo-user] Re: rpm or deb package installs

Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > > I doubt dpkg and rpm aren't going to be much use to you, unless you > > > really want to run two package managers. Besides, both are not > > > especially useful with the front ends apt* and yum. > > > > I'd just use those to unpackage and maybe prepr

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On Saturday 14 February 2015 11:53:23 Neil Bothwick wrote: > Your use of -- to supply extra arguments to emerge. It means you may > be using unsupported options so if it breaks, the pieces are all > yours. Yes, I can read the words, Neil ;-) I just want to know whether it's safe to ignore the

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On 02/14/2015 03:02 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:50:05 Jan Sever wrote: >> On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question... >> >> Good reason? I don't understand. > > He meant he didn't have an answer

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On Saturday 14 February 2015 12:56:09 bitlord wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:33:49 + > > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne > > to me: > > > > $ alias perl-cleaner > > alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:46:01 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mick wrote: > > [...] you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any > > required would be pulled in as dependencies. > > I didn't know that. Thanks. I seem to have quite a few in my wo

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On Saturday 14 February 2015 14:50:05 Jan Sever wrote: > On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > There's a good reason I didn't answer that part of the question... > > Good reason? I don't understand. He meant he didn't have an answer for you. -- Rgds Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On 02/14/2015 02:38 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:26:33 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote: I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums (for equery check) from instal

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:26:33 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote: > >> I was looking for information about the source for checksums of > >> installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage > >> makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in /, or > >> in /var/tmp/portage. A

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 12:19:54 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick wrote: > > > On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 1

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 12:19:54 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick wrote: > > On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord wrote: > > > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200 > > > > > > > > Alexander Kapshu

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Mick wrote: > On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200 > > > > > > Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 11:48:57 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200 > > > > Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > > > > > * Finding left over modules and header > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:33:49 + Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne > to me: > > $ alias perl-cleaner > alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg > --jobs=3 --keep-going' $ perl-cleaner > > ***

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to me: > > $ alias perl-cleaner > alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3 > --keep-going' > $ perl-cleaner > > **

Re: [gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

On 14 February 2015 11:33:49 GMT+00:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to > me: > > $ alias perl-cleaner > alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3 > --keep-going' > $ perl-cleaner >

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bitlord wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200 > Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > > > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > > > * Finding left over modules and header > > > > * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand >

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 +0200 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. > > * Finding left over modules and header > > * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand > * or edited. This script cannot deal with them. > > /usr/lib/

[gentoo-user] Stroppy perl-cleaner

Hello list, What is perl-cleaner objecting to here? It all seems pretty anodyne to me: $ alias perl-cleaner alias perl-cleaner='sudo perl-cleaner --all -- --ask --usepkg --jobs=3 --keep-going' $ perl-cleaner *** You a

Re: Re:[gentoo-user] opengl: missing symlink target for header

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:24:26PM -0200, Urs Schütz wrote: > On 02/13/15 16:19, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > > >Hi guys, > > > > If you have mesa and eselect-opengl-1.3.X installed, could you please > > tell me if the symlink /usr/include/GL/glext.h is broken for you? > > > > Thanks, > > > > V

Re: [gentoo-user] graphviz won't compile

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:46:16 +0100 (CET) Alain Didierjean wrote: > Cannot emerge graphviz : > > ERROR: media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r4::gentoo failed (prepare phase): > * (no error message) > * > * Call stack: > * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_prepare > * environment, line 5657:

[gentoo-user] perl-cleaner lerfovers

'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output. * Finding left over modules and header * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand * or edited. This script cannot deal with them. /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.16.3/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/

Re: [gentoo-user] Package conflict while trying to emerge chromium

Am Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:31 -0500 schrieb "Walter Dnes" : > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 08:02:08PM +0200, Gevisz wrote > > > > 2. I am not sure but my guess is that the gstreamer allows me to watch > >the video from youtube (partially), edX, cousera, etc. in a web-browser > >(I mainly use Fi

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On 02/14/2015 10:36 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:24:21 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote: >> I was looking for information about the source for checksums of >> installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage >> makes checksums (for equery check) from installed fi

Re: [gentoo-user] printing over VPN

On Saturday 14 Feb 2015 03:51:12 Joseph wrote: > On 02/13/15 20:44, Joseph wrote: > >On 02/13/15 22:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >>On 02/13/2015 09:50 PM, Joseph wrote: > >>> I have a hard time finding any documentation on how to print over VPN. > >>> > >>> I have a network printer and I would li

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd net interfaces always want a default route?

> > > It looks like /etc/systemd/system/network@.service requires a gateway= > line, however, for a second interface I wont set another default. Is there > a standard way to so this, or do i have to copy network@.service to a new > name and remove the 'ip route add' line? > > Where this service uni

[gentoo-user] graphviz won't compile

Cannot emerge graphviz : ERROR: media-gfx/graphviz-2.26.3-r4::gentoo failed (prepare phase): * (no error message) * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_prepare * environment, line 5657: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * cp "${EPREFIX}"/usr/share/

Re: [gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:24:21 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote: > I was looking for information about the source for checksums of > installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage > makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in /, or > in /var/tmp/portage. And similarly

[gentoo-user] Source for checksums of installed files

Hi all, I was looking for information about the source for checksums of installed files but I didn't find. I'd like to know whether Portage makes checksums (for equery check) from installed files in /, or in /var/tmp/portage. And similarly whether it makes binary packages (when asked) from /, or a

Re: [gentoo-user] A non-root user can delete files belonging to root. What's going on?

On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:39:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Don't feel too bad, it's one of my favourite geeky Unix trivia factoid > questions. In 10 years, no-one yet has given the correct answer > immediately! You need to ask better people :P > It's also very rare to have a file owned by root