Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-11 Thread Stroller
On 11 Aug 2009, at 16:14, Grant wrote: Josh Saddler had a couple blog posts recently about his adventures with SSD and Gentoo: http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/02/ssds-and-filesystems http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/09/ssds-and-filesystems-part-2 I've been following those

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-11 Thread Grant
> Josh Saddler had a couple blog posts recently about his adventures > with SSD and Gentoo: > > http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/02/ssds-and-filesystems > http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/09/ssds-and-filesystems-part-2 I've been following those (actually posted the first link i

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-10 Thread Paul Hartman
Josh Saddler had a couple blog posts recently about his adventures with SSD and Gentoo: http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/02/ssds-and-filesystems http://blogs.gentoo.org/nightmorph/2009/08/09/ssds-and-filesystems-part-2

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-09 Thread Eray Aslan
On 09.08.2009 16:13, Florian Philipp wrote: [..] > When you think about the situation, laptop-mode might actually make the > situation worse. You see, it was originally developed to help HDDs > staying in standby for longer periods by delaying writes until a read > action causes the drive to spin u

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-09 Thread Grant
>> Here is some info on zflashpoint: >> >> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 >> >> It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". >> >> "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of >> Windows writes are small, so that

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-09 Thread Florian Philipp
Grant schrieb: > Here is some info on zflashpoint: > > http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 > > It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". > > "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of > Windows writes are small,

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-07 Thread Grant
Here is some info on zflashpoint: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of Windows writes are small, so that introduces over

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-07 Thread Florian Philipp
Grant schrieb: >>> Here is some info on zflashpoint: >>> >>> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 >>> >>> It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". >>> >>> "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of >>> Windows writes are small, so that introduc

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-07 Thread Grant
>> Here is some info on zflashpoint: >> >> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 >> >> It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". >> >> "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of >> Windows writes are small, so that introduces overall system lag.

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Florian Philipp
Grant schrieb: > Here is some info on zflashpoint: > > http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 > > It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". > > "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of > Windows writes are small, so that introduces overall sy

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Grant
Here is some info on zflashpoint: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of Windows writes are small, so that introduces over

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Grant wrote: >>> Here is some info on zflashpoint: >>> >>> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 >>> >>> It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". >>> >>> "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of >>> Windows wri

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Grant
>> Here is some info on zflashpoint: >> >> http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 >> >> It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". >> >> "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of >> Windows writes are small, so that introduces overall system lag.

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Grant wrote: > Here is some info on zflashpoint: > > http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 > > It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". > > "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of > Windows writes are small, so

[gentoo-user] {OT} zflashpoint for Linux? (SSD performance "accelerator")

2009-08-06 Thread Grant
Here is some info on zflashpoint: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?p=5163549 It is supposed to be an SSD performance "accelerator". "Gen1 SSDs suffer with small file writes and I read that 90% of Windows writes are small, so that introduces overall system lag. zflashpoint uses a 32