Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread

2009-11-05 Thread Maxim Wexler
In plenty of time for 2012 ;) On 11/5/09, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:24:44 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Didn't they kill hal 2001 before that movie was over? > > Just put it to sleep, so they could wake it up in 2010. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > Of course it's not your day, >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread

2009-11-04 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: > Alex Schuster writes: > > >> Strange. Is hal still in your USE flags? >> It is not really neded, but I think it's nice to have - maybe not for >> x.org, but for other things like automounting devices. Here's the list of >> my packages that need HAL: >> > > I didn't

[gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread

2009-11-04 Thread Harry Putnam
Alex Schuster writes: > Strange. Is hal still in your USE flags? > It is not really neded, but I think it's nice to have - maybe not for > x.org, but for other things like automounting devices. Here's the list of > my packages that need HAL: I didn't tell quite all of it. Hal was not in my us