On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:21:23 maxim wexler wrote:
> #emerge -avD kde-base/kde-meta:kde-4
>
> eight times and everytime I needed to add something to
>
> package.keywords, like so:
> >=x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 ~x86
> >=app-crypt/gpgme-1.1.6 ~x86
> >=dev-util/cmake-2.4.7-r1 ~x86
> >=dev-libs/rasqal-0.
On Saturday 26 January 2008 10:59:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:19:48 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
> > [blocks B ] > blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.0.0)
> >
> > From the gentoo-kde4-faq:
> >
> > Q: You said I could install KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0, but
> > they block each other!
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:19:48 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote:
> [blocks B ] blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.0.0)
> From the gentoo-kde4-faq:
>
> Q: You said I could install KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0, but
> they block each other!
>
> A: You will need to install the latest revision (not
> version) of
Q: You said I could install KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0, but
they block each other!
This is my ideal. Having to ditch kde while I emerge
700M over an eight mile phone line(~70 hours, not
including compile times)is way too long unless I can
do it incrementally over several nights AND keep my
desktop for t
> The above keeps coming up over and over. So, I'll
> have
> to leave it here until I get more info.
>
> -mw
>
more info: I ran # autounmask kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0
again and this time these blocks appeared.
[blocks B ] app-admin/eselect-esd (is blocking
media-sound/esound-0.2.36-r1)
[block
> That's not the split method. Since you chose the
> split packages you need:
> kde-base/kde-meta:kde-4
>
d'oh!
> Add that version to package.keywords. Stable users
> will need ~arch keywords
> for a few dependencies of KDE 4.
>
Ok, I ran
#emerge -avD kde-base/kde-meta:kde-4
eight times a
On Friday 25 January 2008 19:45:39 maxim wexler wrote:
> > Which is rather pointless given that the KDE docs
> > provides example
> > package.{keywords,unmask} files...
> >
> > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4.xml
>
> Thanks for this. The link from kde.org goes to a page
> dated Dec 1
> Which is rather pointless given that the KDE docs
> provides example
> package.{keywords,unmask} files...
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4.xml
>
Thanks for this. The link from kde.org goes to a page
dated Dec 11 2007 which doesn't mention v4.0.
I did what it said using the r
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote:
>
>> I emerged autounamsk and used the command "autounmask
>> kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0" without the quotes of course. There may be a
>> block or two. I had one that involved qt. I also had to mask qt 4.4
>> since it d
On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote:
> I emerged autounamsk and used the command "autounmask
> kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0" without the quotes of course. There may be a
> block or two. I had one that involved qt. I also had to mask qt 4.4
> since it does not have dbus support.
Which is
On Jan 24, 2008 8:42 PM, maxim wexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #eix-sync. Then #emerge autounmask and ran
>
> #autounmask kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0
>
> which completed w/o error.
>
> $eix kde picks up the new version:
>
> <...>
> * kde-base/kde
> Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 3.5.6:3.5
>
>
> Ah, you may have to get a later version of KDE 3.5
> before going any
> farther. I had 3.5.8 on mine and had no blocks with
> it. Want my
> package.keywords and package.unmask files.
Ok, I copied over your files. Ran #update-eix and
#eix-sync. Then #emerge autounmask and ran
#autounmask kd
maxim wexler wrote:
>> Ah, you may have to get a later version of KDE 3.5
>> before going any
>> farther. I had 3.5.8 on mine and had no blocks with
>> it. Want my
>> package.keywords and package.unmask files.
>>
>
> Assuming a question. Yes, I'd like to see them.
>
>
>
>
>
> Ah, you may have to get a later version of KDE 3.5
> before going any
> farther. I had 3.5.8 on mine and had no blocks with
> it. Want my
> package.keywords and package.unmask files.
Assuming a question. Yes, I'd like to see them.
___
--- Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> maxim wexler schrieb:
> > Hi group,
> >
> > $eix kde gives:
> >
> >
> did you do an update-eix?
yes
> >
> kde-4 ist masked. THink thats why it doesn show up.
> What does ls
> /usr/portage/kde-base/ says?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls /usr/portage/
--- Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008, maxim wexler wrote:
> > Hi group,
> >
> > $eix kde gives:
> >
> > <...>
> > * kde-base/kde
> > Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 ~3.5.6:3.5
> > 3.5.7:3.5 ~3.5.8:3.5
> > Installed: 3.5.2
> > Homepage:
maxim wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> $eix kde gives:
>
> <...>
> * kde-base/kde
> Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 ~3.5.6:3.5
> 3.5.7:3.5 ~3.5.8:3.5
> Installed: 3.5.2
> Homepage:http://www.kde.org/
> Description: KDE - merge this to pull in
> all non-
On Thursday 24 January 2008, maxim wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> $eix kde gives:
>
> <...>
> * kde-base/kde
> Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 ~3.5.6:3.5
> 3.5.7:3.5 ~3.5.8:3.5
> Installed: 3.5.2
> Homepage:http://www.kde.org/
> Description: KDE - mer
maxim wexler schrieb:
> Hi group,
>
> $eix kde gives:
>
>
did you do an update-eix?
> <...>
> * kde-base/kde
> Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 ~3.5.6:3.5
> 3.5.7:3.5 ~3.5.8:3.5
> Installed: 3.5.2
> Homepage:http://www.kde.org/
> Description: KDE
Hi group,
$eix kde gives:
<...>
* kde-base/kde
Available versions: 3.5.5:3.5 ~3.5.6:3.5
3.5.7:3.5 ~3.5.8:3.5
Installed: 3.5.2
Homepage:http://www.kde.org/
Description: KDE - merge this to pull in
all non-developer kde-base/* packages
<...>
And h
20 matches
Mail list logo
