>
> Locking type 1 initialisation failed
googling this finds precious little -- whether spelled with an 's' or
a 'z', but check this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118275#c16
A lot like my situation: the unit boots, the above error flashes by, I
log into a crippled system and enter the
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:14:11 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The fact that it's aligned around desktop users is of no significance
> here, but looking back, it would be easy to miss that bit.
>
It was where you said
> I also find in general that rescue systems are not very good at these
> desktop
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 17:44:22 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > I never said you don't want hotplugging. Set rc_hotplug to
> >
> > you said "automatic" hotplugging; is that something else?
>
> I explained that in my previous post, Alan was referring to desktop
> hotplugging, like mounting removable
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:41:14 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> >> Guess you're right, I don't want hotplugging.
> >
> > I never said you don't want hotplugging. Set rc_hotplug to
>
> you said "automatic" hotplugging; is that something else?
I explained that in my previous post, Alan was referring
>> Guess you're right, I don't want hotplugging.
>
> I never said you don't want hotplugging. Set rc_hotplug to
you said "automatic" hotplugging; is that something else?
> "!net.*" to disable network hotplugging, and add net.lo back to the boot
thanks Neil, speeds up the boot process a lot. May
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:32:56 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Going cuckoo here @!#>. I said it was fixed. I uncommented the
> rc_hotplug line in rc.conf and rebooted and it worked! The volumes
> were found and mounted. Fantasia! Now I rebooted again having tried to
> shut of dhcpcd, using rc-update
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:57:32 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > Except Maxim doesn't want automatic hotplugging, he wants to mount
> > the LV from init scripts.
> In /etc/rc.conf I uncommented the line rc_hotplug="*" on a hunch and
> it did the trick!
That's not the hotplugging Alan was referring to
On 6/16/09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:39:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> I also find in general that rescue systems are not very good at these
>> desktopy things, and automagic SD card hotplugging is very much
>> something driven by desktop usage. Try by all means, I just t
On 6/16/09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:39:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> I also find in general that rescue systems are not very good at these
>> desktopy things, and automagic SD card hotplugging is very much
>> something driven by desktop usage. Try by all means, I just t
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:39:56 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I also find in general that rescue systems are not very good at these
> desktopy things, and automagic SD card hotplugging is very much
> something driven by desktop usage. Try by all means, I just think YMMV.
Except Maxim doesn't want au
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:12:06 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > If google or menuconfig's help function doesn't give me an answer in 10
> > minutes, I boot off Ubuntu Netbook Remix on a usb stick (it's a 1G
> > download),
> > and note which modules it loads and settings it uses for stuff. Boot back
> > in
>
> If google or menuconfig's help function doesn't give me an answer in 10
> minutes, I boot off Ubuntu Netbook Remix on a usb stick (it's a 1G
> download),
> and note which modules it loads and settings it uses for stuff. Boot back
> into
> gentoo, configure and build accordingly ... sorted
Does
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 17:52:28 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> >> FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is listed
> >> about 20 times in the boot console before the LVM gives up.
> >
> > Is everything needed to use the SD card compiled into the kernel? As it
> > works after everything is
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:52:28 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Locking type 1 initialisation failed
> Couldn't find devices with uuid etc...
Just a guess, but it could be that it takes a while for the card reader
to recognise the card after the module is loaded.
I wouldn't put part of an LVM on an S
On 6/16/09, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>>> FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is listed
>>> about 20 times in the boot console before the LVM gives up.
>>
>> Is everything needed to use the SD card compiled into the kernel? As it
>> works after everything is loaded, I suspect not. L
>> FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is listed
>> about 20 times in the boot console before the LVM gives up.
>
> Is everything needed to use the SD card compiled into the kernel? As it
> works after everything is loaded, I suspect not. Look for anything
> relevant in the out
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:33:22 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> How did I only get baselayout-1? I used the latest tarballs. And what
> init-script should I use?
Because the tarballs use stable packages and baselayout-2 is still in
testing.
> FWIW only one device, the SD card, can't be found and it is
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 02:33:22 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > With baselayout2 and openrc, you need to explicitly put lvm into the boot
>
> Wow! I didn't even realize lvm was in init.d. There's nothing in the
> doc about it. So I went ahead and added to the boot-level and
> rebooted.
>
> Same as before
>
> So where is the second SSD. This is the 900 you have?
900A, maybe different from yours.
>> Cool! There's all my little dirs. Thanks Neil. But isn't it supposed
>> to do this automaticamente?
>
> Yes, but the duplicate filter line is preventing your VGs from being
> created, so mounting those
>
> #LVM should normally only be started after mdraid is available
> #this is because LVM physical volumes are very often MD devices
> RC_AFTER="mdraid"
>
> #vim: ft=gentoo-conf-d
>
> Well, I don't have mdraid, as far as I know. I'll just comment out
> that line and see where it leads.
>
> mw
nowh
>
> With baselayout2 and openrc, you need to explicitly put lvm into the boot
Wow! I didn't even realize lvm was in init.d. There's nothing in the
doc about it. So I went ahead and added to the boot-level and
rebooted.
Same as before with (looks like) one addition:
...
*The lvm init-script is wri
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:51:54 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > On an Eee 900, the SD card is sdc.
>
> Nope, sdb, just checked. It goes to sdc if you pop it out and push it
> back in again.
So where is the second SSD. This is the 900 you have?
> >> WARNING: Ignoring duplicate config node: filter
> Have you tried with the default filter
> filter = [ "r|/dev/nbd.*|", "a/.*/" ]
exact same result.
mw
On Monday 15 June 2009 18:51:54 Maxim Wexler wrote:
> > Did you mount -a after activating the VG?
>
> Cool! There's all my little dirs. Thanks Neil. But isn't it supposed
> to do this automaticamente?
> From the doc:
>
> Restart your machine and all partitions should be visible and mounted.
>
On 6/15/09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:04:35 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
>
>> My fllter in lvm.conf : filter = [ "a|/dev/sd[ab]|", "r/.*/"] which
>> corresponds to my Phison SSD and a 8G SD card.
>
> On an Eee 900, the SD card is sdc.
Nope, sdb, just checked. It goes to sdc if y
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:04 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> My fresh install of 2.6.29-r5 goes kablooey just after 'Loading module dm-mod'
>
> Then the boot console reports:
>
> Couldn't find device with uuid 'ldwVeS-gw14-HE42-M3Gw-DILI-Dbjh-2lHroF'
>
> and
>
> Couldn't find all phy
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:04:35 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote:
> My fllter in lvm.conf : filter = [ "a|/dev/sd[ab]|", "r/.*/"] which
> corresponds to my Phison SSD and a 8G SD card.
On an Eee 900, the SD card is sdc.
> When I run the reactivate commands given at the end of the above
> document all goes
Hi group,
My fresh install of 2.6.29-r5 goes kablooey just after 'Loading module dm-mod'
Then the boot console reports:
Couldn't find device with uuid 'ldwVeS-gw14-HE42-M3Gw-DILI-Dbjh-2lHroF'
and
Couldn't find all physical volumes for volume group vg.
and
Volume group "vg" not found
The abo
28 matches
Mail list logo
