-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> I just prefer manual "opening" of access means above manual "securing"
> them. It's just about what happens if you fail -- when the task was
> securing, you might have a security leak, but if it was openiung
> access, it is
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:56:16 -0300 "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I would definately prefer to always have a guaranteed working
> > sshd running (I find OpenVPN/telnet a bit strange and an unnecessary
> > potential security hole).
>
> If running permanently, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> So I would definately prefer to always have a guaranteed working sshd
> running (I find OpenVPN/telnet a bit strange and an unnecessary
> potential security hole).
If running permanently, then I agree, but I do
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:25:07 +0200 Alexander Skwar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A "/etc/init.d/sshd stop" won't kill any SSH sessions. It'll
> simply the sshd "master process". Because of that, additional
> logins won't be possible.
An /etc/init.d/sshd stop/restart can very well fail. Depend
On Sunday 16 September 2007 18:01:48 Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Key words "in some circumstances".
>
> Like?
>
> Actually, I never found this to be true.
Never? Good for you.
Grant, the original poster would disagree (who got himself locked out due to
the inability to restart sshd BTW), and so wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alexander Skwar wrote:
> A "/etc/init.d/sshd stop" won't kill any SSH sessions. It'll
> simply the sshd "master process". Because of that, additional
> logins won't be possible.
You seem to believe that most people makes no mistakes. I wouldn't need
6 matches
Mail list logo
