>> >> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> - Grant
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> >> > in kernel config You have mu
Dnia 2010-04-27, wto o godzinie 10:37 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> - Grant
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> - Grant
>> >> >>
>> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> >> > in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. fo
Dnia 2010-04-26, pon o godzinie 19:10 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >> >>
> >> >> - Grant
> >> >>
> >> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> >> > in kernel c
>> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>> >>
>> >> - Grant
>> >>
>> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
>> > in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
>> > there
Dnia 2010-04-23, pią o godzinie 09:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
> >> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
> >>
> >> - Grant
> >>
> > Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> > in kernel config You have multip
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
>>> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
>>
>> OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
>> probably stick wi
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
>>> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
>> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
>
> OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag,
>> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Grant wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Grant wrote:
> > And (its only my private opinion - could base on wrong facts :P) dont be
> > used to hal because the 1.8 xorg-server dont like it any more,
> > preferring udev, and future versions wouldn't probably support hal at
> > all.
> >
> > Lately i
>> Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
>> keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
> Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
> in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
> there is extra one in "thinkp
Dnia 2010-04-22, czw o godzinie 09:47 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >>> Could this be the problem?
> >>>
> >>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] F
On Thursday 22 April 2010 17:47:23 Grant wrote:
> >>> Could this be the problem?
> >>>
> >>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> >>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to o
>>> Could this be the problem?
>>>
>>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
>>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
>>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>>> directory
>>> (EE)
>> Could this be the problem?
>>
>> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
>> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>> directory
>> (EE) intel(0
On 4/21/2010 3:07 PM, Grant wrote:
> Could this be the problem?
>
> # grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
> (EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
>>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>>> bad performance.
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>>
>>> -
>>> deface
>> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
>> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just
On 21 April 2010 12:26, Adam wrote:
>>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>>> bad performance.
>>>
>>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>>
>>> -
>>> deface
>> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
>> moreover
>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>> bad performance.
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>
>> -
>> deface
> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think
Dnia 2010-04-20, wto o godzinie 11:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
> >> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
> >> bad performance.
> >>
> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
> >>
> >> -
> >> deface
> > But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont reall
>> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
>> bad performance.
>>
>> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>>
>> -
>> deface
> But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
> moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think
Dnia 2010-04-19, pon o godzinie 20:24 -0500, deface pisze:
> ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
> bad performance.
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
>
> -
> deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
more
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got bad
performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Grant wrote:
>> did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
>
> I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
>
> - Grant
>
> did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
>> I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
>> the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
>> with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of an
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Grant wrote:
> I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
> the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
> with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
