Am Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC)
schrieb "Thomas Mueller" :
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries the
> nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition through
> many possible categories.
>
> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD pkgsrc and
> FreeB
Hello,
so i have reinstall the qt packages, run python-updater, perl-cleaner and
install calibre with USE="bash-autocompletion" emerge calibre and now is
running. Okay i have seen there is update availible to version 0.9.30, i
hope this run then without mistakes.
Thanks all for help. Have nic
Am 10.05.2013 03:11, schrieb Walter Dnes:
> I'm using the 20130207 install iso. This is to enable me to get a
> *REALLY* predictable NIC name, namely eth0, but I digress. The 2
> warnings I get are...
>
> 1)
>> WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util
>> fdisk doesn
Thanks to those who responded for the suggestions.
I didn't think I sent this same message a second time. If I did, it was
accidental.
Using equery and other portage commands may be better than looking directly at
/var/db/pkg//, sort of like the new pkgng in FreeBSD
which is taking over from
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC)
> schrieb "Thomas Mueller" :
>
>> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries
the nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition
through many possible categories.
>>
>> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> > I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
> > error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
> > few sectors to remove whatever it's complaining about?
> >
>
> fdisk does not suppor
On Fri, 10 May 2013 02:59:55 + (UTC), Thomas Mueller wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm posting this as you don't appear to bother with
reading replies - or do you expect us to CC them to you personally?
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries
> the nuisance factor that finding a package invo
On 10/05/2013 10:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>
>>> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
>>> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
>>> few sectors to remove whatever it's compla
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
> with a GPT disk.
>
> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
> of that are left around confusing fdisk. He wants the remnants to go
Hello,
> server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
Ouch! minpoll and maxpoll should be specified as the log2 of the actual
value, i.e. 6 and 10. Those are the defaults anyway.
> disable auth
> broadcastclient
> server ntp.server.com prefer
This looks fine to me; although configu
On 2013-05-10 03:11, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on '/dev/sda'! The util
>> fdisk doesn't support GPT. Use GNU Parted.
>
> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I
On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
>> with a GPT disk.
>>
>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
>> of that are left ar
On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:55:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I know
> it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be arsed :-)
I'm older (and probably fartier) than you but still welcomed GPT and
gdisk with open arms :P
-
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
>>> with a GPT disk.
>>>
>>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some rem
on 05/10/2013 11:47 AM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200, Michael Hampicke wrote:
>
>>> I've repartitioned it 3 or 4 times, but it still comes up with that
>>> error when I fire up fdisk. Is it a problem, and if so, can I dd a
>>> few sectors to remove what
On Fri, 10 May 2013 06:09:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I
> > know it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be
> > arsed :-)
> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
> so ago. That's a lot
On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:36:38 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
sys-apps/gptfdisk
It contains GPT versions of fdisk, cfdisk and sfdisk.
--
Neil Bothwick
If at first you don't suceed, try the switch marked "Power"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2013/5/10 Thanasis :
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
It's sys-apps/gptfdisk. Took a bit of time finding the package when I
first deployed a Gentoo server some time ago (:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 06:09:25 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>>> I myself still use fdisk whenever I can. I know I should change, I
>>> know it would be good, but I'm an old fart and mostly can't be
>>> arsed :-)
>
>> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week
On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:10:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Well, when I bought my 3Tb drive, I had to use GPT. Yea, I had to
> figure it out but it ain't the end of the world. I think I used cgdisk
> since I usually use cfdisk. They are a lot alike is one reason I used
> it. If I ever replace a drive,
On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>
> Ouch! minpoll and maxpoll should be specified as the log2 of the actual
> value, i.e. 6 and 10. Those are the defaults anyway.
>
> > disable auth
> > broadcastclient
> > se
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:10:19 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, when I bought my 3Tb drive, I had to use GPT. Yea, I had to
>> figure it out but it ain't the end of the world. I think I used cgdisk
>> since I usually use cfdisk. They are a lot alike is one reason I used
>> it.
On 2013-05-10 6:00 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to deal
with a GPT disk.
He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some remnants
of that are left around confusin
On 2013-05-10 7:09 AM, Dale wrote:
I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
so ago. That's a lot for me.
So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I learned
you could still use a monolithic config file, the less this looks like a
big deal.
Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
schrieb Dale :
[...]
> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like it. :/
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Hey now, let's give him a chance :) . He's trying something new and i
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:36:38PM +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> >
> Where do we find gdisk (in portage)?
This app which would be helpful to you, demonstrated:
mingdao@server ~ $ e-file gdisk
* sys-apps/gdisk
Available Versions: 0.6.13 0.6.4_p2-r0 0.5.1-r0 0.6.14
Matched Files:
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your time. I missed the part about log^2 in the
documentation.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/10/13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll 64 maxpoll 1024 iburst prefer
>>
>> Ouch! mi
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:44:54AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to
> deal with a GPT disk.
>
> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some
> remnants of that are left around confusing fdisk. He wants the
> remnants
Am 10.05.2013 04:59, schrieb Thomas Mueller:
> Having package data in /var/db/pkg// carries the
> nuisance factor that finding a package involves a fishing expedition through
> many possible categories.
>
> I am spoiled by having /var/db/pkg/ in NetBSD pkgsrc and
> FreeBSD ports, though FreeBSD
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:00:50AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> That's not quite how I read it, but... gdisk has an option to completely
> erase both GPT and DOS partition tables.
I erased the GPT table.
> Why anyone would choose to use the ultra-kludged DOS partition tables
> when GPT is so m
Alan McKinnon wrote:
>On 10/05/2013 12:00, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:44:54 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> Reading between the lines shows Walter doesn't want to use fdisk to
>deal
>>> with a GPT disk.
>>>
>>> He has a regular partitioned disk that was once GPT, and some
While I'm on the general topic of setting up the disk, I notice that
fdisk startup output includes..
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Since I'll be using ext2 for the 250 meg / and ext4 for the biggie
/home partitio
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
> [...]
>> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
>> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like it. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> He
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 01:12:05AM -0700, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Thanks to those who responded for the suggestions.
>
> I didn't think I sent this same message a second time. If I did, it was
> accidental.
>
> Using equery and other portage commands may be better than looking directly
> at /
OK, I'm getting serious with the install on my new machine, so here
come the questions. "lspci -v" shows the onboard GPU as...
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen
Core processor Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsyste
On 05/10/2013 02:04 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> OK, I'm getting serious with the install on my new machine, so here
> come the questions. "lspci -v" shows the onboard GPU as...
>
> 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen
> Core processor Graphics Controller (r
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-05-10 7:09 AM, Dale wrote:
>> I'm with ya Alan. Update tho. I use LVM. I use grub2 since a week or
>> so ago. That's a lot for me.
>
> So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I
> learned you could still use a monolithic config file, the less th
Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 May 2013 03:15:25 -0500
> schrieb Dale :
>
> [...]
>> I'm glad you posted this. I thought maybe I had hit a time warp or
>> something. Since he posted it twice, I guess he still doesn't like
it. :/
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
>
> Hey now, let's give him a chance :)
On Fri, 10 May 2013 11:54:13 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Why anyone would choose to use the ultra-kludged DOS partition tables
> > when GPT is so much more elegant is beyond me, unless they have old
> > hardware that can't read a GPT disk.
>
> Familiarity, I suppose. I've used the same lay
On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:22:28 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > I used to use cfdisk, but switched to fdisk because cfdisk's partition
> > alignment wasn't good on large drives. That's not a problem with
> > cgdisk.
>
> That was why I had to use cgdisk. The drive is large. I think cfdisk
> spit out a err
On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:33:10 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> So, how was the switch? Uneventful? The more I read, and once I
> learned you could still use a monolithic config file, the less this
> looks like a big deal...
STILL use a monolithic config file? GRUB2 has to use a monolithic config
file, u
On Friday 10 May 2013 17:28:32 Walter Dnes wrote:
> While I'm on the general topic of setting up the disk, I notice that
> fdisk startup output includes..
>
> > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
> > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>
> Since I'll be usi
On 05/10/2013 12:09 PM, Dale wrote:
> My only issue right now is that I can't get the
> memtest thing to work
Maybe I can help you with that one, but it would be easier if you
start that new thread first.
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local time as
well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="UTC"?
I'm running Windows via Virt
On 05/10/13 23:25, Joseph wrote:
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local time as
well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="U
For PHP you need to set the date.timezone variable in the php.ini file -
that should fix things. For asterisk I have no clue.
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Joseph wrote:
> On 05/10/13 23:25, Joseph wrote:
>
>> My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
>> Why
On 05/10/13 23:00, Manuel McLure wrote:
For PHP you need to set the date.timezone variable in the php.ini file
- that should fix things. For asterisk I have no clue.
When I set in: /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="UTC"
my server php and asterisk reporting correct clock setting by on my desktop
On 11/05/13 08:25, Joseph wrote:
My computer time reported by asterisk server or php database is 6hr ahead.
Why?
My desktop clock is correct, and command line "date" reporting local
time as well.
My /etc/conf.d/hwclock
clock="local"
clock_hctosys="YES"
clock_systohc="YES"
Should I set clock="UT
48 matches
Mail list logo
