Hi all,
Code for entering cost-centres before executing the function/thunk
body is generated in `compiler/codeGen/StgCmmBind.hs`, by `thunkCode`
and `closureCodeBody` functions. But we also have some
`enterCostCentreThunk` and `enterCostCentreFun` calls in
`rts/Apply.cmm` and `rts/StgStdThunks.cmm
The s/r conflicts can also be a problem, depending on what you're trying
to parse. It's generally a good idea to get rid of them if you can, but
at the least you should understand why they exist (use happy --info) and
document them in Parser.y.pp.
Cheers,
Simon
On 30/06/2014 14:04, Simon Pey
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> It was converted to markdown, and GHC's build system doesn't know how to
> build markdown docs. It's in libraries/Cabal/Cabal/doc/.
>
Okay then... I can see how the GHC build doesn't want to depend on pandoc!
I'll probably remove this from the
At the risk of sounding redundantly redundant, I'd like to third this.
My workflow for finding stuff in the GHC codebase is a mixture of grep
and Hoogle. Searching Hoogle for "+ghc :: [TyVar] -> Type -> Type" is
a huge timesaver, and Hoogle sends me to the generated haddock
comments. Usually the h
Good to document this in our building guide somewhere.
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Using perhaps
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of
| Herbert Valerio Riedel
| Sent: 01 July 2014 10:19
| To: Jan Stolarek
| Cc:
> It may be worth considering setting BUILD_DPH=NO in some of the
> quick-build templates in mk/build.mk, but I didn't want to change
> anything w/o discussion here first.
+1 from me. I see this change as being beginner-friendly - most newcomers
probably don't need DPH.
Janek
On 2014-06-30 at 08:45:57 +0200, Jan Stolarek wrote:
> Herbert, all,
>
> I just pulled the new HEAD and have a question which I believe was not
> addressed so far. In my
> work on the GHC tree I never pulled the dph subrepo because the only thing it
> adds for me is
> extra build time (of cours
> Sure, I've just added you to the set of users allowed to push to
> GitHub's haskell/haddock repo.
>
> There's a ghc-devs team in the haskell github organization,
>
> https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/ghc-devs
This link is broken. Is this the same as:
https://github.com/orgs/haskell/members
