Alec Burgess wrote:
Since we've had all these messages about this ... I thought I'd ask:
Shouldn't the so-called fix I made, adding a dummy variable with a
value but leaving the remaining two variables (image) and (buffer)
uninitialized still have been a syntax error? I was surprised that it
Alec Burgess wrote:
> Thanks ... I think :-) found the example and perused the linked PDF
> (section 4.2.2. Binding constructs) with out much if any understanding.
>
> I changed:
> (define (save-layer orig-image layer name)
> (let* (
> (image)
> (buffer)
> )
>
> to:
>
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 21:46 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote:
> > This is explained in the release notes for GIMP 2.6:
> > http://gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.6.html
>
> Thanks ... I think :-) found the example and perused the linked PDF
> (section 4.2.2. Binding constructs) with out much if any
>
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote (in part) (on 2008-10-18 at 18:45):
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 18:19 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote:
> > Error while executing script-fu-save-anim-layers:
> > Error: Bad syntax of binding spec in let* : ((image) (buffer))
> >
> > I think this is due to changes
Script has been updated.
Quoting Alec Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Script:
> http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/save-anim-layers.scm
> (apparently by Saul Goode 3/11/2008)
>
> This script was mentioned in bugzilla:
> Bug 556548 – Layer extraction script
> http://bugzilla.gnome.or
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 18:19 -0400, Alec Burgess wrote:
> Error while executing script-fu-save-anim-layers:
> Error: Bad syntax of binding spec in let* : ((image) (buffer))
>
> I think this is due to changes in script-fu (?) but don't know enough
> about script-fu to correct it. Could someon
Script:
http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/save-anim-layers.scm
(apparently by Saul Goode 3/11/2008)
This script was mentioned in bugzilla:
Bug 556548 – Layer extraction script
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556548
Attempts to execute it result in:
Error while executi
