A URL like file;//. is (no longer) supported by Git:
Typically there is no host, and RFC1738 says that file:///
should be used.
Update t5705 to use a working URL.
Reported-by: Michael Blume
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen
---
t/t5705-clone-2gb.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 d
On 2014-11-11 13.49, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I've come to the last piece to speed up "git status", watchman
> support. And I realized it's not as good as I thought.
>
> Watchman could be used for two things: to avoid refreshing the index,
> and to avoid searching for ignored files. The first one can b
On 2014-11-12 22.57, Michael Blume wrote:
[t5705-clone-2gb.sh broken on Mac OS]
It is most probably even broken on every platform,
since we renovated the URL parser in 2013.
(More info can be found here:)
git log t/t5601-clone.sh
I missed t5705-clone-2gb.sh,
because it has its own enabler vari
On 2014-11-13 05.45, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> The request is to allow git to set the file modification time on
> checkout to the commit-author-date of the commit which last modified the
> file.
> Yes I know this is in the FAQ, but the FAQ entry is missing an
> increasingly common use case: docker.
>
The request is to allow git to set the file modification time on
checkout to the commit-author-date of the commit which last modified the
file.
Yes I know this is in the FAQ, but the FAQ entry is missing an
increasingly common use case: docker.
When docker builds an image, it generates layers of im
Hi all,
Apologies if this has already been raised or PEBCAK, but I've noticed
a bug where git log with certain date ranges breaks things. It appears
to be any --since date with a --until date in the future between
2014-12-01 and 2014-12-09. Dates from 2014-12-10 appear to work, and
so does the dat
The 'SubmittingPatches' document contains a small inconsistency
in a patch-email sending procedure.
Not a big thing,
but a newcomer could get confused.
Please,
also consider adding the definition/explanation for all the branches available
at the beginning of this document (and maybe even what th
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johan Herland writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Eric Sunshine
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Johan Herland wrote:
+ test_line_count = 1 actual
>>>
>>> Broken &&-chain. This problem is repeated each p
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Vasenev
---
.../credential/wincred/git-credential-wincred.c| 25 +++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/credential/wincred/git-credential-wincred.c
b/contrib/credential/wincred/git-credential-wincred.c
index a1d38f
>From lib_terminal.sh:
# Reading from the pty master seems to get stuck _sometimes_
# on Mac OS X 10.5.0, using Perl 5.10.0 or 5.8.9.
#
# Reproduction recipe: run
#
# i=0
# while ./test-terminal.perl echo hi $i
# do
# : $((i = $i + 1))
# done
#
# After 2000 iterations or so it hangs.
# https://rt.
Hi,
found a small code redundancy in a builtin command retrieval ('git.c').
For the "master" branch.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Signed-off-by: slavomir vlcek
---
>From 78228e3f7c3029d07827f973fa7992777d6e0cb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: slavomir vlcek
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:
Confirmed exists on master
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Blume wrote:
> This is in pu, haven't checked if it's also in master, this is the
> first time I've run this test
>
> $ GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB=t ./t5705-clone-2gb.sh -v
> Initialized empty Git repository in
> /Users/michael.blume/wor
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:20:22PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 09.11.2014 um 02:59 schrieb Jeff King:
> > test_expect_success 'stale dirs do not cause d/f conflicts (reflogs off)' '
> > - test_when_finished "git branch -d a || git branch -d a/b" &&
> > + test_when_finished "git branch -d
This is in pu, haven't checked if it's also in master, this is the
first time I've run this test
$ GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB=t ./t5705-clone-2gb.sh -v
Initialized empty Git repository in
/Users/michael.blume/workspace/git/t/trash
directory.t5705-clone-2gb/.git/
expecting success:
git config pack.compres
Johan Herland writes:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Eric Sunshine
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Johan Herland wrote:
>>> + test_line_count = 1 actual
>>
>> Broken &&-chain. This problem is repeated each place use invoke
>> test_line_count().
>
> Thanks. Fixed in the n
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Max Horn writes:
>
>> On 11.11.2014, at 23:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> ...
+linkgit:git-fast-import[1]
>>>
>>> This looks somewhat out of place; fast-import is not the only or
>>> even the primary way to do a remote-helper, is it?
>>
>> It depends on how you look
Max Horn writes:
> On 11.11.2014, at 23:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>>> +linkgit:git-fast-import[1]
>>
>> This looks somewhat out of place; fast-import is not the only or
>> even the primary way to do a remote-helper, is it?
>
> It depends on how you look at it, I'd say. If you write a remo
Derek Moore writes:
>> But if you then switch to B from that state, F will not even be
>> modified (i.e. it will keep the contents you prepared for "branch
>> A's instance of F").
>
> Or: the post-commit hook used in the workaround looks up the prior
> branch via @{-1}, finds all files common bet
On 11.11.2014, at 23:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Max Horn writes:
>
>> I did this because I was browsing the remote helper docs online quite a bit,
>> and was wishing for some more direct links between the pages. While I can
>> manyally edit the URL, it seems logical to offer these links direc
> But if you then switch to B from that state, F will not even be
> modified (i.e. it will keep the contents you prepared for "branch
> A's instance of F").
Or: the post-commit hook used in the workaround looks up the prior
branch via @{-1}, finds all files common between @ & @{-1} that don't
shar
Am 09.11.2014 um 02:59 schrieb Jeff King:
> test_expect_success 'stale dirs do not cause d/f conflicts (reflogs off)' '
> - test_when_finished "git branch -d a || git branch -d a/b" &&
> + test_when_finished "git branch -d one || git branch -d one/two" &&
>
> - git branch a/b master
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Joe DF wrote:
> Hello, i have a patch here for the git docs.
> There is a typo.
> See: https://github.com/git/git/pull/103/files
> cheers,
> -
> Joe DF--
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the b
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Joe DF wrote:
> Hello, i have a patch here for the git docs.
> There is a typo.
> See: https://github.com/git/git/pull/103/files
> cheers,
Thanks. This is fixed already [1] in the git "master" branch.
[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/25
Here's a solution that depends only/mostly on blob contents:
1) construct the ident of the blob via an `(echo -e -n "blob \0"
; cat file) | sha1sum` equivalent if an $Id$ string is not found in
its contents,
2) look up the earliest commit with that blob hash at that path, and
3) use the reflog m
Hello, i have a patch here for the git docs.
There is a typo.
See: https://github.com/git/git/pull/103/files
cheers,
-
Joe DF--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo inf
Derek Moore writes:
> I have a case where I would like to smudge files according to the
> reflog information of the switching-to branch.
Don't do that.
When you have branches A, B and C, and a path F is the same between
branches A and B but different in branch C, if you start from branch
C and
Jens Stimpfle writes:
> Signed-off-by: Jens Stimpfle
> ---
Thanks.
Please do better than saying "Fix" to explain your changes in your
log message.
Also, on the Subject:, s/Fix/fix/; s/option./option/ to match other
entries in "git shortlog" message.
"What you think is broken" is clear (i.e.
On 11/11/2014 11:56 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> [+cc git@vger, since this may be of interest to others]
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:40:59PM -0800, Scott Baker wrote:
>
> > I'd like to recreate the github style diffs on the command line. It
> > appears that your diff-highlight is very close. The curre
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Okay, here is my explanation: at the time I wanted to disprove that
> updateInstead could make sense, I wanted to offer a milder version of
> updating the current branch that left the working directory alone:
> detachInstead.
>
> Now, I never used it myself, but I us
Johannes Schindelin writes:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>>
>> > Dying when "update-index --refresh" signals a difference is an
>> > attempt to mimic #1, but it is in line with the spirit of the reason
>> > why a user would want to use u
I have a case where I would like to smudge files according to the
reflog information of the switching-to branch.
This is difficult to achieve because updating HEAD to the new
switched-to refname or commit hash is the last step performed in a
checkout prior to calling the post-checkout hook, and sm
Translate 62 new messages came from git.pot update in 16742b0
(l10n: git.pot: proposed updates for v2.2.0 (+62)).
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow
---
po/de.po | 180 +--
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/po/de.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>>
>> I do not mind much either way. But I doubt that a single extra struct on
>> the stack will break the bank, compared to the fact that we are forking
>> and execing a new program. I'd also not be surprised if a smart compiler
>> could notice th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
HI Dominik,
Good to hear from you.
> working on a relatively old machine with a crypted disk, there are
> really two performance problems with tig on large repos like gcc
> or the Linux kernel. I wonder what would be necessary to
Signed-off-by: Jens Stimpfle
---
Notes:
This patch makes sure that "sob", "cc" and "bodycc" values for
sendemail.suppresscc option are handled, even when the email-addresses in
question are equal to the sender and "self" in not configured in
sendemail.suppresscc.
Sounds c
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> I do not think of a good justification of detachInstead offhand, but
> >> you must have thought things through a lot more than I did, so you
> >> can come up with a work flow description that is more usabl
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > Dying when "update-index --refresh" signals a difference is an
> > attempt to mimic #1, but it is in line with the spirit of the reason
> > why a user would want to use updateInstead, I think. The situation
> >
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin writes:
>
> >> By the way, if the expected use case of updateInstead is what I
> >> outlined in the previous message, would it make more sense not to
> >> fail with "update-index --refresh" failure (i.e. the working tree
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:52:29AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > However, my personal taste says that reusing the same memory is more
> > elegant than to waste extra memory unnecessarily, so I will go with the
> > child_process_init() solution.
>
> I do not mind much either way. But I doubt that a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:45:19AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Okay, I have to say that I was led to believe that reusing the
> child_process struct is okay because argv_array_clear() explicitly
> reinitializes the env_array field, something that is useless churn unless
> you plan to reuse
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > I don't think this is "unfortunately"; freeing the memory was the entire
> > purpose in adding env_array. If you want to easily reuse the same
> > environment in multiple commands, it is still perfectly fine to use
> > "en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 12.11.2014 um 10:12 schrieb Stefan Näwe:
> Am 12.11.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Thomas Ackermann:
>
>> I also re-read the whole document and think it's still up-to-date
>> with Git 2.0. But I might have missed some subtler points.
>
> Hhmm..
> At least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 12.11.2014 um 09:57 schrieb Thomas Ackermann:
>
> I also re-read the whole document and think it's still up-to-date
> with Git 2.0. But I might have missed some subtler points.
Hhmm..
At least this is not 100% up to date:
diff --git a/Documentat
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Johan Herland wrote:
>> + test_line_count = 1 actual
>
> Broken &&-chain. This problem is repeated each place use invoke
> test_line_count().
Thanks. Fixed in the next iteration.
...Johan
--
Johan H
I also re-read the whole document and think it's still up-to-date
with Git 2.0. But I might have missed some subtler points.
Thomas
- Original Nachricht
Von: Junio C Hamano
An: Thomas Ackermann
Datum: 11.11.2014 23:51
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] gittutorial.txt: remove reference
45 matches
Mail list logo
