Thanks for working on this. I have one little bikeshedding comment...
On 05/21/2015 06:14 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> [...]
> There are a few open issues with this series:
>
> 1. Assuming that "seed" is a reasonable verb for this concept, is
> "--seed=" OK for the option? Would "--seed-from="
Jeff King writes:
> Having slept on it, I really think "--seed" should be "fetch from the
> seed into temp refs", and not what I posted earlier.
Yeah, I think that is the right way to do it.
And it happens to mesh well with the (not so well advertised but not
so well hidden) plan to allow loade
Luke Diamand writes:
> diff --git a/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
> b/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
> index 166b840..fe65788 100755
> --- a/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
> +++ b/t/t9813-git-p4-preserve-users.sh
> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ test_expect_success 'preserve users' '
> g
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, McHenry, Matt
wrote:
>> So maybe you can do "GIT_TRACE=2 git svn fetch" and post the output.
>> I'd expect to see something like "git read-tree " before "fatal:
>> unorder...". You can then use git ls-tree to examine this tree,
>> try to sort the file list with "L
On 07/05/15 23:16, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Luke Diamand writes:
[Resurrecting old thread]
Looking at run-command.c, GIT_WINDOES_NATIVE and POSIX seems to use
pretty much the same construct, except that they use SHELL_PATH
instead of "sh".
I think the state of git on Windows is a bit shaky
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> So I think there are two possibilities for improving this:
>
> 1. Find places where we expect the object will not exist (like the
> collision_test check you pointed out) and use a
> "has_sha1_file_fast" that accepts that it may very o
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:00:06PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I don't have any insight about whether mtimes are reliable change
> indicators for directories.
>
> But if you make this change, you are changing the contract of the
> stat_validity functions:
>
> * Have you verified that no cal
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 08:19:03AM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > The other problem is that I'm not sure stat data is enough to notice
> > when a directory changes. Certainly the mtime should change, but if you
> > have only one-second resolution
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:07:46PM +0200, Dmitry Malikov wrote:
> I'm trying to compare 4 different git-diff algorithms and the
> 'minimal' one is the most vague and non-obvious. The documentation
> says "Spend extra time to make sure the smallest possible diff is
> produced." - that's all.
>
> B
9 matches
Mail list logo
