On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> parse-options.c: make OPTION__COUNTUP understand "unspecified" values
>
> A bit clearer: s/understand/respect/
> Also: s/__/_/
Sure.
>> The reason to make it understand negative value
On 03/24/2016 07:47 AM, David Turner wrote:
> [...]
> I incorporated your changes into the lmdb backend. To make merging
> later more convenient, I rebased on top of pu -- I think this mainly
> depends on jk/check-repository-format, but I also included some fixes
> for a couple of tests that had b
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> Add commit.verbose configuration variable as a convenience for those
> who always prefer --verbose taking care of multiple levels of verbosity.
What does "taking care of multiple levels of verbosity" mean? I
suppose you mean that commit.verbo
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> So that we can see how many diffs were contained in the message and use
> them in individual tests where ever it is required. Also use
> write_script() to create the fake "editor".
It is important to explain *why* you want to be able to count
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> parse-options.c: make OPTION__COUNTUP understand "unspecified" values
A bit clearer: s/understand/respect/
Also: s/__/_/
> The reason to make it understand negative values or more specifically
> "unspecified" values is to give the ability to
你的老朋友邀你来Q群:343257759
So that we can see how many diffs were contained in the message and use
them in individual tests where ever it is required. Also use
write_script() to create the fake "editor".
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
---
t/t7507-commit-verbose.sh | 17 +++--
1 file chan
The reason to make it understand negative values or more specifically
"unspecified" values is to give the ability to differentiate whether
`--option` or `--no-option` was specified at all.
Many uses of COUNTUP have now been replaced with BOOL and what remains
are verbose/quiet/force. This change w
Add commit.verbose configuration variable as a convenience for those
who always prefer --verbose taking care of multiple levels of verbosity.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva
---
The previous version of the patch are:
- [v9] $gmane/288820
- [v8]
Previously a TODO; add a test for git-checkout skipping a
file with the skip-worktree bit set.
Signed-off-by: Chhatoi Pritam Baral
---
Replaced test_must_fail around grep with '!', as suggested by Eric.
t/t7012-skip-worktree-writing.sh | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 del
Jacob Keller writes:
> If possible, I would suggest aiming for generating the actual topology
> that the user is seeing, customized so that it gives relevenat
> information, rather than static examples.
Using the real topology in a useful way is actually pretty hard. It's
quite easy to throw the
Hi everyone,
I think I will submit the application as it is now, but still
it would be great to get feedback on it, as I don't think
there was no reply because everything was perfect :(
Thank you! And have an awesome weekend.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:50 PM, elena petrashen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm
Hello,
may I ask a question: what would be the best way to achieve this with GIT:
Database versioning scripts shall be (1) numbered (due to DBmaintain)
and (2) incremental.
ad 1) When a developer commits a script, I should get the next higher
number
than the last committed script. E.g. 045
2016-03-26 17:52 GMT+08:00 惠轶群 :
> 2016-03-26 14:18 GMT+08:00 Pranit Bauva :
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:43 AM, 惠轶群 wrote:
>>> 2016-03-26 2:16 GMT+08:00 Junio C Hamano :
惠轶群 writes:
> # Purpose
> The current implementation of send-email is based on perl and has only
> a tui
To make it clearer:
1. there are so many great mail clients, why not let these experts to handle the
dispatch of mail?
For example, as a One-time-password user of gmail, I have to generate an app
password for each terminal device I'd like to send patch on.
It's more important that I could no
2016-03-26 14:18 GMT+08:00 Pranit Bauva :
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 7:43 AM, 惠轶群 wrote:
>> 2016-03-26 2:16 GMT+08:00 Junio C Hamano :
>>> 惠轶群 writes:
>>>
# Purpose
The current implementation of send-email is based on perl and has only
a tui, it has two problems:
- user must in
[I've quickly looked at the mailing list archive and didn't see this
issue reported. However I might be wrong.]
The issue is simple: `git apply` does not respect the `--work-tree`
argument when called outside the repository.
The version of Git I used is OpenSUSE's official 2.1.4 but also 2.7.4
17 matches
Mail list logo