On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> So I have read the man page on the trailers and it seems like the solution
>> to my problem in removing parts from the commit message.
>> However I did not find out, if it can be run automatically, whenever
>> ca
Stefan Beller writes:
> So I have read the man page on the trailers and it seems like the solution
> to my problem in removing parts from the commit message.
> However I did not find out, if it can be run automatically, whenever
> calling format-patch
>
> Maybe all that is missing here is an opti
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 07:40:07AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Junio C Hamano writes:
> >
> >> (I am not saying that there should be an easy way to drop cruft left
> >> by third-party systems such as "Change-id:" line) ...
> >
> > He
Stefan Beller writes:
> Do we have similar filters somewhere in place already,
> so I could have a look at the code architecture,
> the api, and how the user would operate that?
The clean/smudge filters interacts with the payload data and the end
user configuration in a similar way, I would say.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> (I am not saying that there should be an easy way to drop cruft left
>> by third-party systems such as "Change-id:" line) ...
>
> Heh, that was "should not be", but I guess it was probably obvious.
>
> Sorry for
Junio,
thanks for pointing out, why my patch doesn't make sense here.
Do we have similar filters somewhere in place already,
so I could have a look at the code architecture,
the api, and how the user would operate that?
The way you're proposing, doesn't sound as if a hook would be the right
thin
Junio C Hamano writes:
> (I am not saying that there should be an easy way to drop cruft left
> by third-party systems such as "Change-id:" line) ...
Heh, that was "should not be", but I guess it was probably obvious.
Sorry for the noise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> +post-format-patch
>> +
>> +
>> +This hook is called after format-patch created a patch and it is
>> +invoked with the filename of the patch as the first parameter.
>
> Such an interface would not work well with --stdout mode, woul
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> +post-format-patch
>> +
>> +
>> +This hook is called after format-patch created a patch and it is
>> +invoked with the filename of the patch as the first parameter.
>
> Such an interface would not wor
Stefan Beller writes:
> +post-format-patch
> +
> +
> +This hook is called after format-patch created a patch and it is
> +invoked with the filename of the patch as the first parameter.
Such an interface would not work well with --stdout mode, would it?
And if this only works with o
From: "Stefan Beller"
This comes in handy if you want to post-process formatted patches.
One examplary use case would be removing ChangeIds, which are used
in Gerrit, a program sitting on top of Git, used for tracking
different versions of a patch.
Another use case would be checking if all your
This comes in handy if you want to post-process formatted patches.
One examplary use case would be removing ChangeIds, which are used
in Gerrit, a program sitting on top of Git, used for tracking
different versions of a patch.
Another use case would be checking if all your commits are signed off,
12 matches
Mail list logo
