Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Eric Sunshine writes:
>>
+ This option is equivalent to the argument; the latter
+ wins if both are specified.
>>>
>>> To what does "latter" refer in this case? (I presume it means the
>>> s
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>
>>> + This option is equivalent to the argument; the latter
>>> + wins if both are specified.
>>
>> To what does "latter" refer in this case? (I presume it means the
>> standalone argument, though the t
Hello Junio, Michael -- thanks much for clearing this up for me.
Appreciate your time.
If the --repo option works just like the argument to git
push, then I would suggest -- just as Junio has done -- that you
deprecate this option. Otherwise, it would confuse users.
There is also a minor typo
Eric Sunshine writes:
>> + This option is equivalent to the argument; the latter
>> + wins if both are specified.
>
> To what does "latter" refer in this case? (I presume it means the
> standalone argument, though the text feels ambiguous.)
>
> Also, both the standalone argument and
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> As per the code, the --repo option is equivalent to the
> argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
> when options had to come before arguments.]
>
> Say so. [But not that.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael
Michael J Gruber writes:
> As per the code, the --repo option is equivalent to the
> argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
> when options had to come before arguments.]
>
> Say so. [But not that.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber
> ---
> Thanks for di
As per the code, the --repo option is equivalent to the
argument to 'git push'. [It exists for historical reasons, back from the time
when options had to come before arguments.]
Say so. [But not that.]
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber
---
Thanks for digging up the thread, Junio. I never would h
7 matches
Mail list logo
