Jeff King writes:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:28:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> OK, together with the fact that only ancient versions of fetcher
>> would trigger this "do not reuse" codepath, I agree that we should
>> go the simplest route this patch takes.
>
> By the way, we may wan
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:28:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
> > performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
> > sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating throu
Jeff King writes:
> We could convert OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA on the fly. That _may_ have a
> performance impact. Right now, we are basically doing the equivalent of
> sendfile(), and conversion would involve iterating through each object
> and examining the header. I think that's probably not too
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 10:39:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > However, it's possible that the other side cannot read our
> > packfile verbatim. For example, we may have objects stored
> > as OFS_DELTA, but the client is an antique version of git
> > that only understands REF_DELTA. We negoti
Jeff King writes:
> When we are sending a packfile to a remote, we currently try
> to reuse a whole chunk of packfile without bothering to look
> at the individual objects. This can make things like initial
> clones much lighter on the server, as we can just dump the
> packfile bytes.
>
> However
When we are sending a packfile to a remote, we currently try
to reuse a whole chunk of packfile without bothering to look
at the individual objects. This can make things like initial
clones much lighter on the server, as we can just dump the
packfile bytes.
However, it's possible that the other si
6 matches
Mail list logo
