On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:58:16PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> > --sort=[-][comparison:]field
>> [...]
>> Why not reversed order? So its syntax could be
>>
>> [ "-" ] FIELD [ ":" [ "version" | "v" ] ]
>>
>> It fits better to current f-e-r syn
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 06:58:16PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > --sort=[-][comparison:]field
> [...]
> Why not reversed order? So its syntax could be
>
> [ "-" ] FIELD [ ":" [ "version" | "v" ] ]
>
> It fits better to current f-e-r syntax where modifiers are after the
> colon. And it avoids th
Duy Nguyen writes:
> Why not reversed order? So its syntax could be
>
> [ "-" ] FIELD [ ":" [ "version" | "v" ] ]
>
> It fits better to current f-e-r syntax where modifiers are after the
> colon. And it avoids the possibility that someone adds field "version"
> and we can't tell what "version" is
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> I think I actually prefer the full word "version", as you have already.
> It's clear what it means, and we can extend the syntax generally to:
Agreed. It's hard to find a letter that reminds you about "version".
>
> --sort=[-][comparison:]fie
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:19:24PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > We don't need to do any of that immediately. This is mostly just me
> > thinking aloud, to make sure we do not paint ourselves into a corner
> > compatibility-wise.
>
> Good thinking. If you plan to use the exact same sort syntax f-
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> --sort=version sorts tags as versions. GNU extension's strverscmp is
> used and no real compat implementation is provided so this is Linux only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:39:27PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>
>> --sort=version sorts tags as versions. GNU extension's strverscmp is
>> used and no real compat implementation is provided so this is Linux only.
>
> Sounds like a good go
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:39:27PM +0700, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> --sort=version sorts tags as versions. GNU extension's strverscmp is
> used and no real compat implementation is provided so this is Linux only.
Sounds like a good goal.
I wonder, if we were to merge the for-each-ref and tag
--sort=version sorts tags as versions. GNU extension's strverscmp is
used and no real compat implementation is provided so this is Linux only.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
I didn't know that coreutils' sort is simply a wrapper of strverscmp.
With that GNU extension, implementing --so
9 matches
Mail list logo
