Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The change to the one that feeds 'y' to "reset -p" may be a bit too
> pedantic, as we are not in the business of testing "echo y", though.
Yeah, that's true. Here's a patch for squashing in.
diff --git i/t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh w/t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh
ind
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Kacper Kornet wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet
>
> Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder
>
> Here's a style cleanup on top.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: reset test: modernize style
>
> Avoid command substitution and pipes to ensure that the exit status
> from eac
Kacper Kornet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder
Here's a style cleanup on top.
-- >8 --
Subject: reset test: modernize style
Avoid command substitution and pipes to ensure that the exit status
from each git command is tested (and in particular that a
The test 'reset -p' uses git-reset -p, so it depends on the perl code.
Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet
---
t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh b/t/t7106-reset-unborn-branch.sh
index 8062cf5..499cd88 100755
4 matches
Mail list logo