David Turner writes:
> On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> In the ideal world, I think whoever tries to compare two cache-trees
>> (i.e. test-dump-cache-tree) should *not* care, because we are merely
>> trying to show what the correct tree object name for the node would
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> >>> + sed -n -e "s/[0-9]* subtrees//" -e '/#(ref)/d' -e '/^invalid /p'
> >>> >actual &&
> >
> > Is the second one to remove "#(ref)", which appears for a good
> > "reference" cache tree entry shown for co
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:27 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner
> > wrote:
> >> Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
> >> nor under-invalidates.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> >> ---
Junio C Hamano writes:
>>> + sed -n -e "s/[0-9]* subtrees//" -e '/#(ref)/d' -e '/^invalid /p'
>>> >actual &&
>
> Is the second one to remove "#(ref)", which appears for a good
> "reference" cache tree entry shown for comparison, necessary? Do
> they ever begin with "invalid"? If they eve
Eric Sunshine writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner
> wrote:
>> Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
>> nor under-invalidates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Turner
>> ---
>> t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 26 +++---
>> 1 file chang
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:31 PM, David Turner wrote:
> Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
> nor under-invalidates.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
> t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 26 +++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Add tests to confirm that invalidation of subdirectories neither over-
nor under-invalidates.
Signed-off-by: David Turner
---
t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
index
7 matches
Mail list logo
