Ramsay Jones writes:
> On 03/10/17 04:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> It seems that Pranit needs a bit more work to take known fixes from
>> your efforts and we should wait for the series to be rerolled?
>
> This series is just the first few patches from the original 28/29
> patch series; in pa
On 03/10/17 04:51, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones writes:
>
>> On 02/10/17 14:44, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> ...
>> Yes, I also meant to tidy that up by removing some, now
>> redundant, initialisation later in that function.
>>
>> Note, that wasn't the only bug! (I have probably fo
Hey Junio,
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones writes:
>
>> On 02/10/17 14:44, Pranit Bauva wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>...
>> Yes, I also meant to tidy that up by removing some, now
>> redundant, initialisation later in that function.
>>
>> Note, that wasn't the only bu
Ramsay Jones writes:
> On 02/10/17 14:44, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> [snip]
>>...
> Yes, I also meant to tidy that up by removing some, now
> redundant, initialisation later in that function.
>
> Note, that wasn't the only bug! (I have probably forgotten
> some of them, but look at 964f4e2b0, for exam
On 02/10/17 14:44, Pranit Bauva wrote:
[snip]
>> Look for []-ed comments in the commit messages for a note of
>> the changes I made to your original patches, in patches #2,
>> #4, #7-9, #11-12 and #14.
>>
>> The commits I added, which are just WIP, are as follows:
>>
>> $ git log --oneline bise
Hey Ramsay,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> Hi Pranit,
>
> Just before Junio dropped your 'pb/bisect' branch from his
> repository (and What's cooking), I fetched it locally with
> the intention of finishing it off. (It would have been silly
> to waste all your good work).
On 29/09/17 07:49, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> `--next-all` is meant to be used as a subcommand to support multiple
> "operation mode" though the current implementation does not contain any
> other subcommand along side with `--next-all` but further commits will
> include some more subcommands.
>
> He
Hey Stephan,
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Stephan Beyer wrote:
>
> Hi Pranit,
>
> On 09/29/2017 08:49 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> > It has been a long time since this series appeared on the mailing list.
> > The previous version v15[1] is now split into many parts and I am
> > sending the firs
Hi Pranit,
On 09/29/2017 08:49 AM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> It has been a long time since this series appeared on the mailing list.
> The previous version v15[1] is now split into many parts and I am
> sending the first part right now, will focus on getting this merged and
> then send out the next pa
`--next-all` is meant to be used as a subcommand to support multiple
"operation mode" though the current implementation does not contain any
other subcommand along side with `--next-all` but further commits will
include some more subcommands.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin
Mentored-by: Lars Schne
10 matches
Mail list logo