On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> In ref-filter.c the comparison of refs while sorting is handled by
>> cmp_ref_sorting() function. When sorting as per numerical values
>> (e.g. --sort=objectsize) there is no fallback
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> In ref-filter.c the comparison of refs while sorting is handled by
> cmp_ref_sorting() function. When sorting as per numerical values
> (e.g. --sort=objectsize) there is no fallback comparison when both
> refs hold the same value. This can c
In ref-filter.c the comparison of refs while sorting is handled by
cmp_ref_sorting() function. When sorting as per numerical values
(e.g. --sort=objectsize) there is no fallback comparison when both
refs hold the same value. This can cause unexpected results (i.e. the
order of listting refs with eq
3 matches
Mail list logo