Wink Saville writes:
> Currently I'm not rebasing the other commits (3..9)
> to reduce the amount of work I have to do in each
> review cycle, is that OK?
Yeah, I want to see others more heavily involved in this part of the
system to comment on your patches. As to the organization of the
change
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Wink Saville writes:
>
>> At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
>> same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
>
> I mumbled about making git_rebase__$type functions for all $
Wink Saville writes:
> At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
> same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
I mumbled about making git_rebase__$type functions for all $type in
my previous response, but that was done without even loo
At Junio's suggestion have git-rebase--am and git-rebase--merge work the
same way as git-rebase--interactive. This makes the code more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Wink Saville
---
git-rebase--am.sh | 17 ++---
git-rebase--interactive.sh | 8 +++-
git-rebase--merge.sh
4 matches
Mail list logo