On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:08:22PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> > As a general rule (and why I'm raising this issue in reply to Jonathan's
> > patch), I think most or all sites that want OBJECT_INFO_QUICK will want
> > SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT as well, and vice versa. The reasoning is generally
> > the s
Jeff King writes:
> As a general rule (and why I'm raising this issue in reply to Jonathan's
> patch), I think most or all sites that want OBJECT_INFO_QUICK will want
> SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT as well, and vice versa. The reasoning is generally
> the same:
>
> - it's OK to racily have a false negativ
> As a general rule (and why I'm raising this issue in reply to Jonathan's
> patch), I think most or all sites that want OBJECT_INFO_QUICK will want
> SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT as well, and vice versa. The reasoning is generally
> the same:
>
> - it's OK to racily have a false negative (we'll still be c
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:31:30AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> >> Ensure that these lazy fetches do not occur.
> >
> > That makes sense. For similar reasons, should we be using
> > OBJECT_INFO_QUICK here? If the other side has a bunch of ref tips that
> > we don't have, we'll end up re-scannin
On 10/11/2019 2:12 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:37:39AM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
>> When building the packfile to be sent, send_pack() is given a list of
>> remote refs to be used as exclusions. For each ref, it first checks if
>> the ref exists locally, and if it does, pa
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 11:37:39AM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> When building the packfile to be sent, send_pack() is given a list of
> remote refs to be used as exclusions. For each ref, it first checks if
> the ref exists locally, and if it does, passes it with a "^" prefix to
> pack-objects. Ho
6 matches
Mail list logo
