Hi,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Pratik Karki wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback. Thanks to you, I realized my proposal was
> a bit ambitious. Both git-stash and git-rebase are big
> commitment. After much analyzing, I found out I cannot complete
> both in the given time frame. So, I decided
Hi Johannes,
Thanks for the feedback. Thanks to you, I realized my proposal was
a bit ambitious. Both git-stash and git-rebase are big
commitment. After much analyzing, I found out I cannot complete
both in the given time frame. So, I decided to stick to one and
complete it. I decided to stick wit
Hi Pratik,
thank you so much for posting this inline, to make it easier to review.
I will quote only on specific parts below; Please just assume that I like
the other parts and have nothing to add.
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Pratik Karki wrote:
>
> Timeline and Development Cycle
> --
Hi,
This is my draft for my proposal on "Convert Scripts to builtins" for GSoC.
Please review and provide feedback.
Cheers,
Pratik Karki
Convert Scripts to builtins
===
Abstract
Many components of Git are still in the form of shell and Perl scripts.
This has c
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Pratik Karki wrote:
> Hi,
> This is my draft for my proposal on "Convert Scripts to builtin" for GSoC.
> Please review and provide feedbacks.
>
> https://gist.github.com/prertik/daaa73a39d3ce30811d9a208043dc235
It would be easier for us to comment if the mar
5 matches
Mail list logo