Scott Chacon venit, vidit, dixit 09.03.2015 18:14:
> Hey,
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
>>> wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
ProGit/Github promotion site. I don
Hi,
David Kastrup wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>> If people don't like git-scm.com and want to have an alternate site,
>
> I think that's the basic problem here.
With all due respect:
I don't actually see a major problem here. Any serious problems with
the site can be fixed by people submitting
Jeff King writes:
> If people don't like git-scm.com and want to have an alternate site,
I think that's the basic problem here. As long as people want to _have_
an alternate site rather than want to _write_ and _maintain_ an
alternate site, any site will only be as representative of the Git
com
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:52:34AM -0700, Scott Chacon wrote:
> > * some of the pull request can be rejected even if the developers want
> > them, like this pull request to add back a list of contributors was:
> >
> > https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/216
> >
> > (By the way this pull reques
David Kastrup writes:
> Scott Chacon writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Personally, I consider the recent migration of the Emacs repository to
>>> Git a bigger endorsement but then that's me.
>>
>> I would love to have Emacs on that page, actually. If you guys
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:49 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> since many people coming to the page are doing research to figure out
>> if they want to switch to it in their companies. It also demonstrates
>> that these large companies are participating in the open source
>> community
>
> Uh no, it does
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> A few other points about git-scm.com:
>
> * as Michael says it "still looks a bit like a ProGit/Github promotion site"
>
> * some of the pull request can be rejected even if the developers want
> them, like this pull request to add b
Scott Chacon writes:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Personally, I consider the recent migration of the Emacs repository to
>> Git a bigger endorsement but then that's me.
>
> I would love to have Emacs on that page, actually. If you guys want me
> to add that, I'm happ
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Scott Chacon wrote:
> >
> > It might make sense to reduce this list just to "Projects" since those
> > are actually more tangible and verifiable. Or scrap it altogether.
> Sorry, I disagree with this. I think it's helpful for people to see
> some important corpora
Hey,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
> >> ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and
> >> git-scm.com pro
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:37 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Shawn Pearce writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Shawn Pearce writes:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
>
> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks
Shawn Pearce writes:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Shawn Pearce writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
>>> wrote:
Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have an
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:06 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Shawn Pearce writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
>>> ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and
>>> g
Shawn Pearce writes:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
>>
>> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
>> ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and
>> git-scm.com provides a lot of the information that users are loo
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Michael J Gruber
wrote:
>
> Since we're talking business: git-scm.com still looks a bit like a
> ProGit/Github promotion site. I don't have anything against either, and
> git-scm.com provides a lot of the information that users are looking
> for, and that are hard t
15 matches
Mail list logo
