On 01/06/2009 23:39, Sven Panne wrote:
So my question is again: Why is -fPIC not the default for GHC on x86_64? If we
don't want the overhead, that's OK (any benchmark numbers?), but then GHC's
documentation should really contain a big, fat warning that GHCi's dynamic
linker gets cases like the
Am Montag, 1. Juni 2009 22:48:56 schrieb Duncan Coutts:
> I don't know how the problem reported in that message is related to the
> renderString problem (which I do not understand), but the behaviour you
> see there is not terribly surprising. It's an artefact of the way
> dynamic linking works and
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 20:05 +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
> [ Reprise of an old GHCi problem, GHC HQ read on please... ]
>
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 09:24:14 schrieb Matthijs Kooijman:
> > I've been playing around with GLUT (latest version from hackage, on Debian)
> > a bit yesterday and am having so
[ Reprise of an old GHCi problem, GHC HQ read on please... ]
Am Mittwoch, 20. Mai 2009 09:24:14 schrieb Matthijs Kooijman:
> I've been playing around with GLUT (latest version from hackage, on Debian)
> a bit yesterday and am having some troubles with renderString. It works
> fine when I compile a