Hi,
I'd like to know wether anyone here is using GHC on OpenBSD *and*
relying on the Haskell-Platform meta package for OpenBSD. If there's
no need for the HP meta package, I could just start to update GHC
and all related packages for OpenBSD, but if there are a lot of
people who prefer to stick to
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:15:59PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > Regarding Question 7 (enable dynamic by default on other platforms)
> > and OpenBSD: as long as it's easy to disable it again, I'll be happy
> > with *any* decision.
>
> It will be easy to turn it off, but depending on the platfo
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 02:52:48PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> The various issues are described in a wiki page here:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DynamicByDefault
>
> If you have a few minutes to read it then we'd be glad to hear your
> feedback, to help us in making our deci
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:31:23PM +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > One potential problem is that some Linux distributions really don't like
> > it if you bundle modified versions of external libraries. However, I
> > just don't see a way around this: [...]
[...]
> I guess this means me... Ind
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:35:17PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >Next best idea is to make GHC use repeatable temporary .c& .o file
> >names for each invocation. There is already a unique temporary
> >directory where all the the temporary files are created. This suggests
> >I do not need to worry
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> I still have to find my noticeses about wether cBooterVersion affects
> more than only the ghc lib.
Did a quick test the other day; bootstrapping ghc-7.0.3 from
ghc-6.12.3 with two different VERSION_DATE files. The only v
iao,
Kili
1 patch for repository http://darcs.volkswurst.de/ghc-6.12/ghc:
Sat Apr 24 20:46:21 CEST 2010 Matthias Kilian
* Zap cBooterVersion, in an attempt to fix #4012
Note: this is obviously just a workaround, not a real fix.
New patches:
[Zap cBooterVersion, in an attempt
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:51:52PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:59:23PM +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >>Also, the initial upload was built using ghc-6.12.1, while the upload
> >>now is build with ghc-7.0.2. Given that it is a two-stage compiler, I
> >>assume that the
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:59:23PM +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Also, the initial upload was built using ghc-6.12.1, while the upload
> now is build with ghc-7.0.2. Given that it is a two-stage compiler, I
> assume that the output should be identical, but it seems not to be the
> case.
Changin
Hi,
I'd expect the following program (compiled with ghc and without any
specieal flags) to produce
Just (Exited ExitSuccess)
True
but it produces
Just (Exited ExitSuccess)
False
on Debian Lenny (ghc-6.8), OpenBSD-current (ghc-6.12.3), OpenBSD-current
(ghc=7.0 fr
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:36:55PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.0.2:
>
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/7.0.2-rc1/
Some random notes for OpenBSD:
- No close look at the test suite results yet, but at least I didn't
notice
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Julien Dessaux wrote:
> I'm using the LDAP lib for one of my projects and I found a problem
> while building it on an OpenBSD system. It wouldn't compile because there is
> a macro named differently in the ldap.h include file. Under linux, this
> macro
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:05:36PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >hReady002(ghci)
> > ==> did not investigate yet. failure details below
>
> This one is a known failure right now (I need to clean it up).
Good to know. Thanks for the info.
> >num009(normal,optc,hpc,optasm,ghci)
> >
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 6.12.3:
[...]
> Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> before the release!
Here are some test results on OpenBSD/amd64, with an 800 MB data
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> A few of the tests in the test suite assume a UTF-8 locale, so you're
> probably falling foul of that. We could fix the tests - but we do want
> to test that the locale encoding is being respected in some way, so just
> adding hSet
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:53:22AM -0700, Judah Jacobson wrote:
> > Anyway, the short story is that I have to either hard-code the
> > character set to something like utf-8, or ghc will start to behave
> > really strange (for example, ghci would terminate immediately if
> > you just *type* a n
Hi,
as some of you may know, I'm working on an update of OpenBSDs ghc
port to 6.12.2, currently chasing down the last remaining testsuite
failures. Yesterday, I ran into a problem which I have a fix for,
but only a really ugly fix, and I need some opinions of what users
would prefer.
The problem
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 04:02:03PM +0900, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > Just for the record let me report the following build failure for f14
> > (rawhide):
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2107186
[...]
> I have reproduced this now also with ghc-6.12.1
>
> "inplace/bin/ghc-stage
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 08:44:29PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> module Main(main) where
>
> import System.IO
> import System.Process
>
> main = do
> hin <- openBinaryFile "/dev/null" ReadMode
> hp <- runProcess "/bin/ls&
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:48:17PM +0400, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> I have tested ghc-6.12.1.20100330 on Debian Linux, i386-family,
> on the DoCon test, without profilig.
> It looks all right.
Even if I reported to Ian that everything is fine on OpenBSD, I
just found some strangeness with o
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:42:27PM +0100, Nicolas Martyanoff wrote:
> > This probably means some type identifier used at that point hasn't
> > been declared, or macro defined or whatever. You'd have to see
> > what it is, and maybe it will be more obvious what went wrong.
> It seems that SIZEOF_VO
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:10:52PM +0100, Nicolas Martyanoff wrote:
> I'm trying to cross-compile GHC as follows:
>
> Host: Linux, x86_64, GHC 6.12.1
> Target: OpenBSD 4.6 stable, i386
IMHO, you shouldn't go that way, because it adds much more complexity
than you already have with OpenBSD as host
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 03:29:09PM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> > No need for 6.8, you can build 6.10 straight with 6.6.
>
> Ok, I guess I didn't try hard enough..
Probably just
--with-iconv-includes=/usr/local/include \
--with-iconv-libraries=/usr/local/lib
missing to ./conf
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 09:22:56AM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I somehow managed to first install everything what's required on system
> provided 6.6.1 to compile 6.10. I'm not sure if I went step by step
> 6.6.1->6.8.3->6.10.3 as you try.
No need for 6.8, you can build 6.10 straight with 6.6.
>
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 05:30:44AM +0200, Thanos Tsouanas wrote:
> Up to now I've only used binary versions of GHC, but since
> my operating system's (OpenBSD) version of GHC is
> lagging behind (currently at 6.6.1), I need to update it.
> I tried using my system's ghc-6.6.1 to compile ghc-6.10.4
>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:19:26AM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> seems that wizards are on holiday ATM, so i will help a little - ghc
> ports are divided into registerized (working with cpu registers)
> and unregisterized (just a C code generated).
I wouldn't touch the *registerized* variant usi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:34:53AM -0700, Donn Cave wrote:
> I'm thinking it would be expedient to omit Haddock while building a
> ghc 6.11 snapshot, per bug ticket #3531
>
> >From my basic understanding of its purpose there, that ought to work out
> fine - I mean, not to undervalue documentation,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:17:35AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Glad you got it going. I notice there are a few test failures, many of
> which could be fixed easily, e.g.
>
> --- ./lib/IO/hClose002.stdout.normalisedWed Sep 16 14:08:09 2009
> +++ ./lib/IO/hClose002.run.stdout.normalised
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:23:58AM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Before going to trace anything I've compared sparky and my setup and it
> seems I've had forgotten libiconv library in /usr/local/lib and
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH contained this lib. So I've modified LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
> exclude /usr/local/li
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 03:03:43PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> This is a summary of our plans for GHC 6.12.1.
>
> We are aiming to have the first release candidate out on the 14th
> September 2009.
>
> Until then, we plan to focus on the bugs in the 6.12.1 milestone, marked
> high priority; they a
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:54:49PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> > Is there something like pax(1) available on solaris? If so, it
> > should be be preferred, because it's a POSIX tool, so there's some
> > hope that it behaves the same on different systems.
>
> Yes, pax is available under solari
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:30:51PM +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > I've just been informed that unpacking the binary (i386) solaris
> > distribution using bunzip2 and tar:
>
> It may work better in future if you use a non-GNU tar to pack it up in
> the first place. GNU tar uses a non-standard tar
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> H Kili,
>
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:36:00PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> >
> > In your case, it doesn't find libiconv, thus isn't built, and causes
> > failure later. In my case (a buildbot
Hi,
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 11:03:49PM -0700, brad clawsie wrote:
> after some trying, i was unable to get the 6.10.3 prerelease to build on
> freebsd 7.2. i was trying to use an existing 6.10.2 as my build ghc.
>
> i saved the output of the entire build from ./configure to the point of
> failure
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:36:56PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > A fix from Conal Elliott has already been pushed by Ian.
>
> Indeed! Now compilation aborts on "booting" testsuite with following output:
>
> make: Entering directory `/buildbot/ghc/kgardas/build/testsuite'
> make: *** No rule to m
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 09:15:51PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> ghc-pkg: /buildbot/ghc/kgardas/build/ghc/inplace-datadir/package.conf:
> openFile: does not exist (No such file or directory)
[...]
> Do you have any idea what's going wrong this time? Is it a problem of my
> bot (shall I install anyth
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:46:31AM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > pthread_mutex_unlock() is called, evidently from fileLock(), with an
> > invalid mutex.
> >
> > NetBSD's pthread implementation differs from Linux in its intolerance
> > of such things.
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:44:07PM -0800, Donn Cave wrote:
> I tried to build GHC 6.10.1 on NetBSD 4.0 this afternoon, and ran into
> an error, where cabal-bin calls the stage2 ghc in utils/installPackage.
>
> pthread_mutex_unlock() is called, evidently from fileLock(), with an
> invalid mutex.
>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 06:38:02PM +0100, dermiste wrote:
> I've successfully built GHC-6.10.1 from 6.6.1 on OpenBSD 4.4, and
> would like now to generate a hc-file-bundle to build it without
> pre-existing GHC. I followed the instructions in [1], but I'm stuck
> with this error :
> Linking dist-in
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:26:35PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> A full test log is available at
> http://openbsd.dead-parrot.de/ghctests/ghc-6.10-openbsd-i386.log
Same for openbsd-amd64, built from sources pulled from the darcs
repository at 15/Oct/2008:13:00:00 +0200:
http://openbs
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:07:33PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> And my problem with the testsuite was a PEBKAC (of course): on
> OpenBSD, python is installed as python-2.3, python-2.4, python-2.5
> (you can have several versions installed in parallel), which isn't
> found by co
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:46:34AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > BTW: I had some problems running the testsuite some weeks ago,
> > because some autoconf'd stuff was missing. When building from the
> > repository (*not* from the source tarballs), are there any additional
> > steps beyond
> >
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 01:35:43AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> We are pleased to announce that the GHC 6.10.0.20080921 snapshot is a
> beta release of GHC 6.10.1.
[...]
> Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> before the release!
Not quite the beta snapshot, b
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:34:36PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > I've changed it to "-perm -111"
>
> Unfortunately, this will only find files with the executable bit
> set for user, group and owner, so it should be "-perm +111". However,
> even
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> The error far below is caused by "-perm /a+x" in mk/bindist.mk
> during find:
>
> I've changed it to "-perm -111"
Unfortunately, this will only find files with the executable bit
set for user, group and owner, so it should b
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> I've tried to build a binary dist on x86 under Solaris and did not succeed.
>
> "make binary-dist" failed with
>
> 1.
> for FILE in ; do if [ -e $FILE ]; then echo
> ghc-6.10.0.20080921/gmp/$FILE >>
> /export/local1/home/maed
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >Is this a change from 6.8.3? NetBSD currently provides 6.8.3 as an
> >optional package for NetBSD/i386 4.0, with ghci included and without
> >any mmap patches as far as I know. It was also working for me on
> >NetBSD/amd64 (which is
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:03:34AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >Yes, it relies only on the Cabal metadata, but the output is a
> >Makefile only useful for building GHC.
>
> Ok, this statement is plainly not true, since I can use 'cabal makefile'
> to build any package outside of the GHC build tr
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:29:03PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Basically, the .cabal file is just converted into some other format
> that may be included by another Makefile.
Oops! I again read your (SimonM's) proposal on changing Cabal and
the GHC build system in exactly this way
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:59:37AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >Well, at least the Makefile creation was a step (the first step?)
> >into the wrong direction, IMHO. I'll run a GHC build to get some
> >of those generated Makefiles and followup on cvs-ghc, but for a
> >starter, Cabal shouldn't know
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:17:59PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
[...]
> As for Cabal - we had a thread on cvs-ghc last week, and as I said there
> we'd love to hear suggestions for how to improve things, including wild
> and crazy ideas for throwing it all away and starting again. However, as
> I
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:35:36AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >for an unregisterised ghc-6.8.2 (or newer), are the .hi files
> >dependent (except for the 32 vs. 64 bit word size)? I had a quick
> >look at the stuff in compiler/iface, but the only MD part I found
> >was that 32/64 bit difference.
Hi,
for an unregisterised ghc-6.8.2 (or newer), are the .hi files
dependent (except for the 32 vs. 64 bit word size)? I had a quick
look at the stuff in compiler/iface, but the only MD part I found
was that 32/64 bit difference.
TIA
Ciao,
Kili
ps: if you think this sounds like a complet
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:18:01PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Porting is "simply broken" for various reasons at the moment - in
> particular the switch to Cabal for building the libraries broke it. We
> knew this at the time, but felt it was more important to make the switch
> now and fix boo
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:13:01PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
[Philip K.F. Hölzenspies:]
> >make hc-file-bundle
> >
> >Making the hc-file-bundle target failed, because not all rts/*.cmm had
> >rts/*.hc counterparts after the build. The make fails because of this
> >fragment from the Makef
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:23:54PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> First thing to note is that bootstrapping from HC files has bitrotted in
> 6.8.x, see http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1346. I've updated
> the wiki instructions to say this. You should go back to 6.6.x, or be
> prepared
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:06:57AM +, Jim Burton wrote:
> In file included from Stg.h:150,
> from Rts.h:19,
> from mkDerivedConstants.c:23:
> Regs.h:30:45: gmp.h: No such file or directory
For a starter, look at http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2009
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:32:20AM -0800, Don Stewart wrote:
> > I have just built and installed ghc-6.8.2 on my linux box but I can't find
> > the network package. Has it been moved or left out?
>
> It's not installed by default. You can find it on hackage.haskell.org,
>
> http://hackage.has
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:41:23PM +, jim burton wrote:
> Thanks for that, the configure script gets to the end with that help.
> Following the instructions at
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Porting#PortingGHCtoanewplatform
> , I then try to make includes but get a big stre
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:42:21PM +, jim burton wrote:
> I'm trying to build unregistered 6.8.2 on NetBSD Alpha 2.1.0_STABLE -- I
> have the following problem which seems to be same as this one -
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1860
No, I think it's another problem.
> $ ./confi
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 05:20:18PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> > > > Prologue junk?: .type s32x_ret, @function
> > > > s32x_ret:
> > > > pushl %ebp
> > > > movl%esp, %ebp
> >
> > I see nearly the same problem with ghc-6.8.2 on OpenBSD, using the
> > gcc-3.3.5 include
[Note: already shortly discussed with Wilhelm]
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:30:06PM +, Wilhelm B. Kloke wrote:
> > ../../compiler/stage1/ghc-inplace -package-name unix-2.2.0.0
> > -hide-all-packages -i -idist/build/autogen -idist/build -i. -Idist/build
> > -Iinclude -#include "HsUnix.h" -#incl
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:15:29PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >What puzzles me a little bit is the fact that this does *not* happen
> >on amd64 (aka x86_64) but only on i386 so far.
> >
> >So does this ring a bell for anyone? I didn't find anything similar
> >in the archives or in the bug tracker
Hi,
I'm currently working on updating the GHC port to 6.6.1 for OpenBSD,
and when I run the testsuite (ghc-regress), all test cases for the
way "threaded1", i.e. debug + threaded bail out with an assertion
failure:
Blocks: 132 live + 123 free = 255 total (508 around)
conc010: internal error: ASS
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:48:13PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
> How or where can I pick up the testsuite for this new version? I want to
> test my own builds.
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.6.1/ghc-testsuite-6.6.1.tar.gz
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000, Sven Panne wrote:
> Sven Panne wrote:
> > [...] This has been fixed for 4.07, but as people are supposed to be
> > able to build 4.07 with pre-4.07 compilers, I'll change those
> > identifiers in the driver sources with something more defensive.
>
> I've just realised that t
Hi!
I hope this isn't a FAQ, but AFAIR this hasn't been asked in the past:
Are there plans to replace the ghc frontend (driver), which is currently
written in perl, by a version implemented in Haskell?
I know that perl is nice for fiddling with command line options, but on
the other hand, it's
Hello,
Is there any interface to mmap(2) available? Something that behaves like
an immutable array would be great.
An mmap may have a signature like
mmap :: Ix a, ?? b => Handle -> IO (Array a b)
I've no idea what types should be allowed for b. It has to be some fixed
size type, e.g. Int, but
Hi!
I wonder what the cvs release naming strategy is. Ist 4.06 on the main cvs
branch, or is there a special tag for official releases, or what else?
A `cvs up -dPA -r 4.06' in the fptools directory simply removed everything
(don't worry, I did make a copy before the update).
Bye,
Kili
> The best thing to do is use the anoncvs repository, and just 'cvs update' to
> get the latest patches. If you're running over a phone line then it might
> help to make ssh do some compression.
Yes, but this requires at least one complete checkout. Of course, after
this is done, cvs update will
Hello!
Is there a patch file (e.g. a context
diff) from GHC 4.04 to GHC 4.04pl1
available. This could save lots of
bandwith, download time and
(private user's) phone bills.
Kili
--
de: Signaturen erzeugen Krebs.
en: Signatures cause cancer.
Please send other translations.
Am Mon, 16 Aug 1999 I wrote:
>are compiled with the standard ghc which (in my setup) uses plain gcc withou
>-fno-strict-aliasing. So I have to try it again, with my installed ghc driver
>patched.
FYI: I've completely recompiled ghc with -fno-strict-aliasing passed to gcc,
even in the previously i
>Perhaps the same is happening with GHC's RTS. You can ask gcc-2.95 to
>be less aggressive by using -fno-strict-aliasing (I think; consult
>the documentation). I'd be interested to hear if this makes any
>difference.
I've already tried this with no success. However, it seems that during the
ma
Hello all,
I want to try to localize the problems occurring when using a gcc-2.95 compiled
ghc-4.04. As I stated in a recent mail, the bug seems to be somewhere in the
runtime system/libraries.
For a test, I want to compile the whole ghc including all libraries to .hc
files. For one version, I'l
>I'm building it now, so I'll hopefully have some results later today.
If this helps (applies to linux-2.2.10, glibc-2.1.1, libgpm-2.0.2, compiled as
shared libs, AMD K6-II):
- As I've already said, using a egcs-1.1.2 compiled ghc-4.04 seems to work
fine, even with gcc-2.95 used as the C compile
Hmmm. On my machine, at least my own programs compile fine with ghc-4.04 and
gcc-2.95. I didn't yet try to recompile ghc-4.04, however.
FYI: it's a K6-II running linux-2.2.10 with glibc-2.1.1.
Kili
Why is the parser (parser/Parser.hs) compiled with -H80M? This causes an error
on my ghc-4.02 (default max heap size 64M). Instead of increasing the
maximum heap size, I just tried -H64M, which works fine (and it should also
work without -Hxxx, but it would take probably longer to compile).
BTW:
Thank you all for your tips.
I've compiled first ghc-3.02 using the .hc files and then ghc-4.02 which
required an additional -dcore-lint on the following files:
compiler/rename/ParseIface.lhs
lib/exts/Int.lhs
lib/exts/Word.lhs
lib/posix/PosixTTY.lhs +
lib/std/PrelArr.lhs
lib/std/PrelHandle.lhs
l
Hi!
I'm trying to compile ghc-4.02 source on Linux. Using the binary ghc-4.02
distribution, it stops with `heap exhausted' on
ghc/compiler/rename/ParseIface.o.
Now I'm looking for the .hc files to bootstrap the compiler, but the newest
version I found was 4.00 on the glasgow ftp server. Is there
79 matches
Mail list logo
