RE: Bug in placing _stub.o files with HEAD

2005-08-03 Thread Simon Marlow
On 01 August 2005 15:19, Einar Karttunen wrote: > "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I thought I fixed this in CVS recently (rev. 1.54 of >> Distribution.Simple.Build to be exact). Are you running Cabal from >> CVS, or some other version? > > Cabal from CVS. The versions are GHC 6.5.2

Re: Bug in placing _stub.o files with HEAD

2005-08-01 Thread Einar Karttunen
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought I fixed this in CVS recently (rev. 1.54 of > Distribution.Simple.Build to be exact). Are you running Cabal from CVS, > or some other version? Cabal from CVS. The versions are GHC 6.5.20050728 and Cabal-1.1.2. I created a small Cabal package

RE: Bug in placing _stub.o files with HEAD

2005-08-01 Thread Simon Marlow
On 30 July 2005 01:21, Einar Karttunen wrote: > I noticed the following behaviour using GHC 6.5.20050728: > If compiling a Cabal package containing hs-source-dirs it > places the _stub.o under dist/build//path/to/Module > when Cabal expects it in dist/build/path/to/Module. Things > appear to work

Bug in placing _stub.o files with HEAD

2005-07-29 Thread Einar Karttunen
Hello I noticed the following behaviour using GHC 6.5.20050728: If compiling a Cabal package containing hs-source-dirs it places the _stub.o under dist/build//path/to/Module when Cabal expects it in dist/build/path/to/Module. Things appear to work without hs-source-dirs. For example with "hs-so