On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:51:23PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
Christian Maeder wrote:
Testsuite results are bad for ghc-6.10.1.20090314, see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3106
Patch for the cygpath not found issue is attached to the ticket. Please
(Windows/Cygwin/Mingw users
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
./bootstrap.sh: !: not found
Under Solaris sh is not bash!
Indeed.
According to the OpenGroup that syntax should be fine:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_09_02
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:12 -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2009 Mar 17, at 20:28, Duncan Coutts wrote:
It works for me under Solaris 10. Perhaps Solaris 9 or older do not
have a standard compliant /bin/sh program. What do you suggest we use
instead as a workaround?
For
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:28:50AM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
unix = 2.0 2.4
Changing to = 2.4 was not sufficient, so I changed it to = 2.5.
This will affect any OS!
Hmm, it's a bit suspicious that the major version
GHC 6.10.2 will have a problem with cabal-install-0.6.2!
When I tried to install cabal-install-0.6.2 for ghc-6.10.1.20090314
I needed to change #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash in bootstrap.sh to avoid the
following errors:
-bash-3.00$ ./bootstrap.sh
Checking installed packages for
Christian Maeder wrote:
Testsuite results are bad for ghc-6.10.1.20090314, see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3106
Patch for the cygpath not found issue is attached to the ticket. Please
(Windows/Cygwin/Mingw users especially) test it.
Thanks,
Karel
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
GHC 6.10.2 will have a problem with cabal-install-0.6.2!
When I tried to install cabal-install-0.6.2 for ghc-6.10.1.20090314
I needed to change #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash in bootstrap.sh to avoid the
following errors:
-bash-3.00$
On 2009 Mar 17, at 20:28, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Under Solaris sh is not bash!
Indeed.
According to the OpenGroup that syntax should be fine:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_09_02
It