Thanks Vijay.
Regards,
Avra
On 05/22/2015 11:46 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 05/22/2015 11:41 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
Given that we are holding all patches till we get the regression tests
fixed, can't we get a couple more vms. That will help increase the pace.
Have offlined slave23.clou
HI All
Please can you review below patches which are required for 3.7
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10815/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10197/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10850/
Thanks&Regards
Anand.N
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gl
On 05/22/2015 11:41 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
Given that we are holding all patches till we get the regression tests
fixed, can't we get a couple more vms. That will help increase the pace.
Have offlined slave23.cloud.gluster.org. Please go ahead and let us know
once you are done.
Thanks
Hi,
Given that we are holding all patches till we get the regression tests
fixed, can't we get a couple more vms. That will help increase the pace.
Regards,
Avra
On 05/21/2015 10:46 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
There are two extra CentOS 6 VM's online for debugging stuff with,
but they're both in
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Gluster Devel"
> Cc: "Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna" , "Sachin Pandit"
>
> Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2015 10:50:14 AM
> Subject: Enhancing Quota enforcement during parallel writes
>
> All,
>
> As pointed by [1], parallel writes can re
All,
As pointed by [1], parallel writes can result in incorrect quota enforcement.
[2] was an (unsuccessful) attempt to solve the issue. Some points about [2]:
in_progress_writes is updated _after_ we fetch the size. Due to this, two
writes can see the same size and hence the issue is not solve
> Yes and we should add them to is_bad_test() in run-tests.sh too.
I have added these tests in the etherpad. See http://review.gluster.org/10888
for adding it to run-tests.sh.
~kp
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.glust
hi,
These functions return 0 when 0filled and non-zero value when not
0filled. This is quite unintuitive as people think that it should return
_gf_true when 0filled and false when it is not 0filled. This comes up as
bug in reviews quite a few times, so decided may be it is better to
change
On 05/22/2015 07:13 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or,
noticed by others?
1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t
Run:
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull
2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth
Hi all,
I am working towards providing RichACL support in Gluster. This is a
crucial step towards multi-protocol support. Currently Andreas Gruenbacher
is the driving force behind RichACL efforts in ext4 file-system and other
file-systems. See his earlier mail for more details:
http://www.gluste
> Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or,
> noticed by others?
>
> 1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t
>Run:
> http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull
>
> 2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
>Run:
> http://build.gluster.org/jo
Are the following tests in any spurious regression failure lists? or,
noticed by others?
1) ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t
Run:
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/9363/consoleFull
2) ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
Run:
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regres
hey,
Thanks a lot for these materials. I will start going through them right
away.
Regards,
Akarsh
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Joseph Fernandes
wrote:
> Hey Akarsh,
>
> Here is some material you would find handy to learn GlusterFS internals
>
> GlusterFS Code documents:
>
> http://gluste
Hey Akarsh,
Here is some material you would find handy to learn GlusterFS internals
GlusterFS Code documents:
http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
GlusterFS Development workflow:
~~
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Development_Work_Flow
There are two extra CentOS 6 VM's online for debugging stuff with,
but they're both in use at the moment:
* slave0.cloud.gluster.org
* slave1.cloud.gluster.org
Sachin Pandit, Raghavendra Bhat, and Krutika Dhananjay, are using
them. Ping them, and organise with them when you can use them. I
wa
Hey,
Thanks. i wasn't expecting this speedy response to a beginner. Will take up
your advice to learn the development work flow.
Regards,
Akarsh
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Welcome Akarsh. We are glad that you are interested in contributing to
> Gluster and thats w
Welcome Akarsh. We are glad that you are interested in contributing to
Gluster and thats what we expect as a community.
I would suggest you to go through some coverity defects we have and you can
start fixing them (will let you know the link in sometime) that will give
you some sort of confidence
Hello Everyone,
After attending a workshop on GlusterFs and Open source softwares organised
by RedHat, i am highly motivated to learn more about glusterFs and how can
i join this community and contribute to make this software better.
I would like to introduce myself first and tell something about
On 05/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Thursday 21 May 2015 06:48 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/21/2015 04:04 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:50 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/19/2015 11:23 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Did that (in the attached script that I sent) and it still failed.
On Thursday 21 May 2015 06:48 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/21/2015 04:04 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:50 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/19/2015 11:23 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Did that (in the attached script that I sent) and it still failed.
Please note:
- This dd command passes (or f
Hi,
Can I get access to a rackspace VM so that I can debug this particular
testcase on it.
Regards,
Avra
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression failure in
volume-snapshot-clone.t
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:08:05 +0530
From: Vijay Bellur
To: Av
On 05/21/2015 04:04 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:50 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/19/2015 11:23 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Did that (in the attached script that I sent) and it still failed.
Please note:
- This dd command passes (or fails with EDQUOT)
- dd if=/dev/zero of=$N0/$mydi
Commets inline.
- Original Message -
> From: "Subrata Ghosh"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org, gluster-us...@gluster.org
> Cc: "Nobin Mathew" , "Susant Palai"
> , "Vijay Bellur"
>
> Sent: Thursday, 21 May, 2015 4:26:05 PM
> Subject: Regarding the issues gluster DHT and Layouts of bricks
On 05/21/2015 02:44 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
I am not able to reproduce this failure in my set-up. I am aware that
Atin was able to do so successfully a few days back, and I tried
something similar with the following loop.
for i in {1..100}; do export DEBUG=1; prove -r
./tests/basic/volume-
Hi,
I am not able to reproduce this failure in my set-up. I am aware that
Atin was able to do so successfully a few days back, and I tried
something similar with the following loop.
for i in {1..100}; do export DEBUG=1; prove -r
./tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone.t > 1; lines=`less 1 | grep
Thanks KP.
On 05/21/2015 02:15 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
The regressions have passed on http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10871/
Patch merged.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/glust
> The regressions have passed on http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10871/
Patch merged.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
The regressions have passed on http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10871/
Regards,
Avra
On 05/21/2015 12:29 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 05/21/2015 12:27 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 05/21/2015 12:23 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
Smoke test has failed due to jenkins related issue. We need to
ret
http://review.gluster.org/10872 needs review(s) from folks who
understand DHT/rebalance process lifecycle.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 09:50 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/19/2015 11:23 AM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 08:36 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 05/19/2015 08:10 AM, Raghavendra G wrote:
After discussion with Vijaykumar mallikarjuna and other inputs in this
thread, we are proposing all quota tes
30 matches
Mail list logo
