On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> I would also recommend running perf-test.sh [1] for regression.
>
Would it be useful to have this script maintained as part of the
Gluster organization? Improvements/changes could perhaps be more
easily tracked.
> [1] https://github.com/avat
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:18:05PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see.
> > We've
> > only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to pro
On 08/29/2016 08:25 AM, Nigel Babu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
Hello folks,
I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we
can do upstream. Niels today solved half
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see.
> We've
> only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the
> following:
>
> If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, y
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:55:00PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> > > Hello folks,
>> > >
>> > > I've had chats with
hi,
Could we have release checklist for the components? Please add the
steps that need to be done before the release is made at this link:
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-component-release-checklist. This
activity needs to be completed by 2nd September. Please also add if the
tests are
May I suggest running:
https://github.com/avati/perf-test/blob/master/perf-test.sh
This has reasonable number of different workloads and it also gives out
numbers.
We probably need to generate a report based on a baseline and the daily run
so that we can take a look at it when the numbers don't lo
Below is a write-up on tiering counters (bz 1275917) I give three options, and
I think option (1) and (3) are doable. (2) is harder and would need more
discussion.
Currently counters give limited information on tiering behavior. They are just
a raw count of the number of files moved each direct
Hi all,
Proposing the following:
Title: Object Storage with Gluster
Agenda
* Why object storage ?
* Swift API and Amazon S3 API
* Using swift to provide object interface to Gluster volume
* Object operations
* Demo
-Prashanth Pai
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra G"
> To: "Ar
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:55:00PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what
> > >
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 01:49:52PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we
> > can do upstream. Niels today solved half my problem by pointing out t
Late in the day India time would be best, I think. 1400 UTC perhaps?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Michael Scherer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so since the release is on the 30, I was wondering if people would be ok
> with a small (less than 1h) downtime for upgrade and snapshot of the
> disk of gerrit
Forwarding, because coffee didn't reach my brain yet
--
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
so since the release is on the 30, I was wondering if people would be ok
with a small (less than 1h) downtime for upgrade and snapshot of the
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:01:18PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we
> can do upstream. Niels today solved half my problem by pointing out that we
> can
> get physical nodes on CentOS CI. The general idea is to
Hello folks,
I've had chats with Manoj and Ambarish about performance testing and what we
can do upstream. Niels today solved half my problem by pointing out that we can
get physical nodes on CentOS CI. The general idea is to run iozone[1] and
smallfile[2] on a fixed frequency for master (to begin
More info here.
Massif puts the following warning on volume unmount:
===
valgrind: m_mallocfree.c:304 (get_bszB_as_is): Assertion 'bszB_lo ==
bszB_hi' failed.
valgrind: Heap block lo/hi size mismatch: lo = 1, hi = 0.
This is probably caused by your program erroneously writing past the
end of a
Hello.
While dancing around huge memory consumption by FUSE client [1], I was
suggested by Pranith to use Massif tool to find out the reason of the
leak.
Unfortunately, it does not work for me properly, and I believe I do
something wrong.
Instead of generating report after unmounting volum
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
> To: "Prashanth Pai"
> Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Rajesh Joseph"
> , "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> , "Soumya Koduri" , "Csaba Henk"
> , "Jiffin Thottan"
> , "Aravinda Vishwanathapura Krishna Murthy"
> , "Anoop Chirayath Manjiyil
> Sajan"
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:48:46AM -0400, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updated inline.
>
> - Original Message -
...
> > > > 3) Md-cache perf improvements in smb:
> > >
> >
> > > > Feature owner: Poornima
> > >
> >
>
> Feature undergoing review. It will be in tech-preview
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:45:01AM -0400, Prashanth Pai wrote:
>
>
> -Prashanth Pai
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Soumya Koduri"
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Rajesh Joseph"
> > , "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> > , "Csaba Henk" , "Niels de Vos"
> > , "Jiffin Thottan"
> > , "
On 08/26/2016 09:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug),
want to get a sense if any of the status of the features.
Please respond with:
1) Feature already merged
2) Undergoing review will make it by 31st Aug
3) Undergoi
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
> hi,
> Now that we are almost near the feature freeze date (31st of Aug),
> want to get a sense if any of the status of the features.
>
> Please respond with:
> 1) Feature already merged
> 2) Undergoing r
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We have not pruned our Gerrit maintainers list ever as far as I can see.
> We've
> only added people. For security reasons, I'd like to propose that we do the
> following:
>
> If you do not have a commit in the last 90 days, y
23 matches
Mail list logo
