On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:11 AM, Shyam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail should have been out 3-4 days earlier than now as branching is 2
> days away, but hopefully it is not too late.
>
> The current release scope can be seen at [1].
>
> If you do *not* recognize your nick in the following list then yo
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently a new ability to trigger statedumps through the Gluster-CLI [0]
> has been added. This makes it possible to get statedump from
> applications that use gfapi. By default, statedumps are saved under
> /var/run/gluster/... and
On 04/25/2017 09:03 PM, Shyam wrote:
I merged https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16806/ which depends on
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16796/ and hence is failing regressions
for all other patches.
Fixing it up as I type this mail!
Merged the dependent patch [1] (it had the required review scores
I merged https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16806/ which depends on
https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16796/ and hence is failing regressions
for all other patches.
Fixing it up as I type this mail!
Shyam
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster
Hi,
This mail should have been out 3-4 days earlier than now as branching is
2 days away, but hopefully it is not too late.
The current release scope can be seen at [1].
If you do *not* recognize your nick in the following list then you can
help us out by looking at pending reviews [2] and m
On 04/25/2017 10:16 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 04/20/2017 02:46 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
2) IPv6 support (@kaushal)
This is under review at https://review.gluster.org/16228 . The patch
mostly looks fine.
The only issue is that it currently depends and links with an internal
FB fork of tirpc (mainly for s
On 04/25/2017 10:08 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote:
1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith)
Sorry for the delay in response. Due to some
How this affect CPU usage? Does it read whole file and calculates a
hash after it is being written?
Will this patch land in 3.10.x?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/188 is merged in master
> and needs to go
Hi,
Recently a new ability to trigger statedumps through the Gluster-CLI [0]
has been added. This makes it possible to get statedump from
applications that use gfapi. By default, statedumps are saved under
/var/run/gluster/... and this directory is only writable by root.
Applications that use gfap
Hi,
Anyone knows of any solutions I can just drop in my current gluster setup and
help me with administrative tasks (create, delete, quota, acl etc) from a web
ui?
Thanks,
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
On 04/25/2017 03:32 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
Hi
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/188 is merged in master
and needs to go in 3.11
Appropriate github project board updates done, thanks.
Further, thanks for noting (in the github issue) that this commit was
made before
On 04/20/2017 02:46 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
2) IPv6 support (@kaushal)
This is under review at https://review.gluster.org/16228 . The patch
mostly looks fine.
The only issue is that it currently depends and links with an internal
FB fork of tirpc (mainly for some helper functions and utilities).
T
On 04/25/2017 07:40 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote:
1) Halo - Initial Cut (@pranith)
Sorry for the delay in response. Due to some other work engagements, I
couldn't spen
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-04-25-d6194de9
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Shyam wrote:
> On 02/28/2017 10:17 AM, Shyam wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With release 3.10 shipped [1], it is time to set the dates for release
>> 3.11 (and subsequently 4.0).
>>
>> This mail has the following sections, so please read or revisit as needed,
>> - Releas
Recently we had worked on some patches to ensure correct stats are returned.
https://review.gluster.org/15759
https://review.gluster.org/15659
https://review.gluster.org/16419
Referring to these patches and bugs associated with them might give you some
insight into the nature of the problem. The
Hello,
I tried reproducing the problem that Mateusz Slupny was experiencing
before (stat returning bad st_size value on self-healing) on my own
computer with only 3 bricks (one being an arbiter) on 3.10.0.
The result with such a small setup was that the bug appeared both on
killing and during
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:55:30PM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> Thanks for this detailed Email with clear instructions Niels.
>
> Can we have this as github issues as well? I don't want this information to
> be lost as part of email thread in ML archive. I would like to see if I can
> get some in
Thanks for this detailed Email with clear instructions Niels.
Can we have this as github issues as well? I don't want this information to
be lost as part of email thread in ML archive. I would like to see if I can
get some interns to work on these leaks per component as part of their
college proje
Hi,
with the use of gfapi it has become clear that Gluster was never really
developed to be loaded in applications. There are many different memory
leaks that get exposed through the usage of gfapi. Before, memory leaks
were mostly cleaned up automatically because processes would exit. Now,
there
Hi Serkan,
Even though bitrot is not enabled, versioning was being done.
As part of it, on every fresh lookup, getxattr calls were
made to find weather object is bad, to get it's current version
and signature. So a find on gluster mount sometimes would cause
high cpu utilization.
Since this is a
Hi
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/188 is merged in master
and needs to go in 3.11
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Kaushal M"
> To: "Shyam"
> Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org, "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 12:16:39 PM
> Subject
Thanks Kotresh.
Let me discuss in my team and will let you know.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <
khire...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> As this is an enhancement it won't be back ported to 3.7/3.8/3.10
> It would be only available from
Hi Abhishek,
As this is an enhancement it won't be back ported to 3.7/3.8/3.10
It would be only available from upcoming 3.11 release.
But I did try applying it to 3.7.6. It has lot of conflicts.
If it's important for you, you can upgrade to latest version.
available and back port it. If it's imp
24 matches
Mail list logo