Re: [Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?

2016-09-30 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hello, > > When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a > follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are > still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it. > > Users are getting confused about

[Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?

2016-09-30 Thread Niels de Vos
Hello, When NFS-Ganesha does an UNLINK of a filename on an inode, it does a follow-up check to see if the inode has been deleted or if there are still other filenames linked (like hardlinks) to it. Users are getting confused about the errors that are logged by RPC, DHT and AFR. The file is missin

Re: [Gluster-devel] RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log level?

2016-09-30 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" > To: gluster-devel@gluster.org > Cc: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Nithya Balachandran" > , "Pranith Kumar > Karampuri" > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:51:05 PM > Subject: RPC, DHT and AFR logging errors that are expected, reduce log leve