Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS and the logging framework

2014-05-07 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 05/07/2014 10:21 AM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: We have had some feedback/concerns raised regarding not including the messages in the header file. Some external products do include the message strings in the header files which helps for documentation as well as easier editing. Is there mor

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for setxattr

2014-05-07 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
- Original Message - > From: "Vijay Bellur" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" , "Anand Avati" > > Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org > Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 7:16:12 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for > setxattr > > On 05/06/2014 01:07 PM, Prani

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for setxattr

2014-05-07 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
I think with "repetitive log message suppression" patch being merged, we don't really need gf_log_occasionally (except if they are logged in DEBUG or TRACE levels). - Original Message - > From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > To: "Vijay Bellur" > Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org, "Anand Avati

Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for setxattr

2014-05-07 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" > Cc: "Vijay Bellur" , gluster-devel@gluster.org, "Anand > Avati" > Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 3:42:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP for > setxattr > > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regression tests: Should we test non-XFS too?

2014-05-07 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 05/06/2014 10:44 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote: For those of us who are toying with the idea of using ZFS as the underlying filesystem but are hesitating only because it is not widely tested, a regression test on ZFS would be very welcome. If there are some issues running it at redhat for license rea

[Gluster-devel] Gluster Community Weekly Meeting

2014-05-07 Thread Vijay Bellur
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Asia/Kolkata BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETTO:+0530 TZOFFSETFROM:+0530 TZNAME:IST END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:7b49ac44-ffca-4de4-a179-f9edde80bf1e RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTER

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Anand Subramanian
Hi Sobhan, Thanks for the comments. It was a very quick writeup so that there is at least some clarity on the implementation internals. I will try to find time and plug in some more details. I am not quite sure what you mean by "the default value of the option of uss" but am assuming its the

[Gluster-devel] Reminder: Weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins

2014-05-07 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
Reminder!!! The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 8 mins, in #gluster-meeting on IRC. This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged to attend and be a part of it. :) To add Agenda items *** Just add them to the main text of the Google Doc, and **be at th

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reminder: Weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins

2014-05-07 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 05/07/2014 10:33 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Reminder!!! The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 8 mins, in #gluster-meeting on IRC. 25 minutes, not 8. This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged to attend and be a part of it. :) To add Agenda items ***

Re: [Gluster-devel] Reminder: Weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins

2014-05-07 Thread Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
On 05/07/2014 10:33 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Reminder!!! The weekly Gluster Community meeting is in 30 mins, in #gluster-meeting on IRC. This is a completely public meeting, everyone is encouraged to attend and be a part of it. :) To add Agenda items *** Just add them to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Addition of sub-maintainers

2014-05-07 Thread Shyamsundar Ranganathan
Awesome! Congratulations folks. Shyam On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 04/30/2014 09:28 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> >> We plan to perform update gerrit to provide access to sub-maintainers by >> end of this week (i.e. 4th May). If you have any objections, concerns or >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Anand Subramanian
Hi Paul, that is definitely doable and a very nice suggestion. It is just that we probably won't be able to get to that in the immediate code drop (what we like to call phase-1 of the feature). But yes, let us try to implement what you suggest for phase-2. Soon :-) Regards, Anand On 05/06/201

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Sobhan Samantaray
I think its a good idea to include the auto-remove of the snapshots based on the time or space as threshold as mentioned in below link. http://www.howtogeek.com/110138/how-to-back-up-your-linux-system-with-back-in-time/ - Original Message - From: "Anand Subramanian" To: "Paul Cuzner" C

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Jeff Darcy
> Attached is a basic write-up of the user-serviceable snapshot feature > design (Avati's). Please take a look and let us know if you have > questions of any sort... A few. The design creates a new type of daemon: snapview-server. * Where is it started? One server (selected how) or all? * How

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Ira Cooper
Anand, I also have a concern regarding the user-serviceable snapshot feature. You rightfully call out the lack of scaling caused by maintaining the gfid -> gfid mapping tables, and correctly point out that this will limit the use cases this feature will be applicable to, on the client side. If

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] OS X porting merged

2014-05-07 Thread Harshavardhana
> We're running OSX 10.8.5 with OSXFUSE 2.6.4 > # make -v > GNU Make 3.81 > Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. > There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A > PARTICULAR PURPOSE. > This program b

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Volume Create Failed

2014-05-07 Thread Cary Tsai
Does the volume name really matter? No to mentioned snoopy is a trademark, chance is small that glusterfs would use it internally. I can try other name Thanks Cary On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Yang Ye wrote: > have you tried using name other than snoopy? > On 6 May 2014 11:25, "Cary Tsai"

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] OS X porting merged

2014-05-07 Thread Dan Mons
A bug reported by one of our testers: When a symlink exists to another directory in the tree, an infinite loop of directories occurs. We're running OSX 10.8.5 with OSXFUSE 2.6.4 # make -v GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for co

Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: build: Support for unit tests using Cmockery2

2014-05-07 Thread Harshavardhana
This has been really bothering me a bit as our queues are getting bigger and bigger upstream to even get smallest of the patches to get fixed quickly. In these scenarios a decentralized regression testing could be made mandatory? stage-1 tests - runs on the Author's laptop (i.e Linux) - git hook

Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: build: Support for unit tests using Cmockery2

2014-05-07 Thread Luis Pabon
I agree that this is a major issue. Justin and I for a while tried to build the regressions on different VMs (other than build.gluster.org). I was never successull in running the regression on either CentOS 6.5 or Fedora. Once we are able to run them on any VM, we can then parallelize (is th

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Volume Create Failed

2014-05-07 Thread Yang Ye
have you tried using name other than snoopy? On 6 May 2014 11:25, "Cary Tsai" wrote: > # gluster peer status > Number of Peers: 3 > > Hostname: us-east-2 > Uuid: 3b102df3-74a7-4794-b300-b93bccfe8072 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: us-west-1 > Uuid: 98906a76-dd5b-4db9-99d5-1d51

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] OS X porting merged

2014-05-07 Thread Dan Mons
> Anyways moving on - can you open a bug for this? this is an interesting issue > perhaps `mac-compat` could be a real culprit here. Done. Bug 1095525. -Dan ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] OS X porting merged

2014-05-07 Thread Justin Clift
On 05/05/2014, at 8:57 AM, Bernhard Glomm wrote: > fwiw > > I use cfengine to automate MAC, (don't like messing with launchd and > > shell scripts anymore ;-) > > http://www.cfengineers.net/downloads/cfengine-community-packages/ That's a good point. Once GlusterFS is definitely happy on OSX, i

Re: [Gluster-devel] Change in glusterfs[master]: build: Support for unit tests using Cmockery2

2014-05-07 Thread Justin Clift
On 07/05/2014, at 8:40 PM, Luis Pabon wrote: > I agree that this is a major issue. Justin and I for a while tried to build > the regressions on different VMs (other than build.gluster.org). I was never > successull in running the regression on either CentOS 6.5 or Fedora. Once we > are able t

Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS and the logging framework

2014-05-07 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Thanks Vijay. I will go ahead with approach 2. Regards, Nithya - Original Message - From: "Vijay Bellur" To: "Nithya Balachandran" Cc: "Dan Lambright" , "gluster-users" , gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Wednesday, 7 May, 2014 2:34:49 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] GlusterFS and the lo

[Gluster-devel] Whats meaning about the inode link in fuse kernel such as fuse_direntplus_link

2014-05-07 Thread Jianguo Bao
Dear, In reading the fuse kernel code and glusterfs ,i always meet the word 'inode link',what is the excat meaning? Thanks -- _ Baul e-mail: roidi...@gmail.com _

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Varun Shastry
Hi Sobhan, On Wednesday 07 May 2014 09:12 PM, Sobhan Samantaray wrote: I think its a good idea to include the auto-remove of the snapshots based on the time or space as threshold as mentioned in below link. http://www.howtogeek.com/110138/how-to-back-up-your-linux-system-with-back-in-time/

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design

2014-05-07 Thread Sobhan Samantaray
- Original Message - From: "Varun Shastry" To: "Sobhan Samantaray" , ana...@redhat.com Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org, "gluster-users" , "Anand Avati" Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:16:11 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] User-serviceable snapshots design Hi Sobhan, On Wednesday 07 May